» Articles » PMID: 27882307

Metabolic Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Where We Are

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Nov 25
PMID 27882307
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, the development of diagnostic methods based on metabolic imaging has been aimed at improving diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and perhaps at improving therapy. Molecular imaging methods can detect specific biological processes that are different when detected within cancer cells relative to those taking place in surrounding normal tissues. Many methods are sensitive to tissue metabolism; among them, positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) are widely used in clinical practice and clinical research. There is a rich literature that establishes the role of these metabolic imaging techniques as valid tools for the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of PCa. Until recently, European guidelines for PCa detection still considered both MRSI/MRI and PET/CT to be under evaluation, even though they had demonstrated their value in the staging of high risk PCa, and in the restaging of patients presenting elevated prostatic-specific antigen levels following radical treatment of PCa, respectively. Very recently, advanced methods for metabolic imaging have been proposed in the literature: multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), hyperpolarized MRSI, PET/CT with the use of new tracers and finally PET/MRI. Their detection capabilities are currently under evaluation, as is the feasibility of using such techniques in clinical studies.

Citing Articles

Trends in Population-Based Studies: Molecular and Digital Epidemiology (Review).

Denisov N, Kamenskikh E, Fedorova O Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2023; 14(4):60-70.

PMID: 37179982 PMC: 10171044. DOI: 10.17691/stm2022.14.4.07.


Targeting cancer-specific metabolic pathways for developing novel cancer therapeutics.

Pal S, Sharma A, Padalumavunkal Mathew S, Jaganathan B Front Immunol. 2023; 13:955476.

PMID: 36618350 PMC: 9815821. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.955476.


Carbon sources and pathways for citrate secreted by human prostate cancer cells determined by NMR tracing and metabolic modeling.

van Heijster F, Breukels V, Jansen K, Schalken J, Heerschap A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(14):e2024357119.

PMID: 35353621 PMC: 9168453. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024357119.


Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients.

Marinkovic M, Popovic M, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Nikolic M, Cavic M, Gavrilovic D Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:7943609.

PMID: 35178455 PMC: 8844388. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7943609.


Challenges in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis from Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Corradini D, Brizi L, Gaudiano C, Bianchi L, Marcelli E, Golfieri R Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(16).

PMID: 34439099 PMC: 8391234. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13163944.


References
1.
Costello L, Guan Z, Kukoyi B, Feng P, Franklin R . Terminal oxidation and the effects of zinc in prostate versus liver mitochondria. Mitochondrion. 2005; 4(4):331-8. PMC: 4464835. DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2004.07.031. View

2.
Mankoff D . A definition of molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(6):18N, 21N. View

3.
Flavell R, Westphalen A, Liang C, Sotto C, Noworolski S, Vigneron D . Abnormal findings on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging predict subsequent biopsy upgrade in patients with low risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Abdom Imaging. 2014; 39(5):1027-35. PMC: 4169752. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0136-7. View

4.
Jung J, Coakley F, Vigneron D, Swanson M, Qayyum A, Weinberg V . Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. Radiology. 2004; 233(3):701-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333030672. View

5.
Schuster D, Votaw J, Nieh P, Yu W, Nye J, Master V . Initial experience with the radiotracer anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid with PET/CT in prostate carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(1):56-63. View