» Articles » PMID: 22411097

Beam Quality Corrections for Parallel-plate Ion Chambers in Electron Reference Dosimetry

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2012 Mar 14
PMID 22411097
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current dosimetry protocols (AAPM, IAEA, IPEM, DIN) recommend parallel-plate ionization chambers for dose measurements in clinical electron beams. This study presents detailed Monte Carlo simulations of beam quality correction factors for four different types of parallel-plate chambers: NACP-02, Markus, Advanced Markus and Roos. These chambers differ in constructive details which should have notable impact on the resulting perturbation corrections, hence on the beam quality corrections. The results reveal deviations to the recommended beam quality corrections given in the IAEA TRS-398 protocol in the range of 0%-2% depending on energy and chamber type. For well-guarded chambers, these deviations could be traced back to a non-unity and energy-dependent wall perturbation correction. In the case of the guardless Markus chamber, a nearly energy-independent beam quality correction is resulting as the effects of wall and cavity perturbation compensate each other. For this chamber, the deviations to the recommended values are the largest and may exceed 2%. From calculations of type-B uncertainties including effects due to uncertainties of the underlying cross-sectional data as well as uncertainties due to the chamber material composition and chamber geometry, the overall uncertainty of calculated beam quality correction factors was estimated to be <0.7%. Due to different chamber positioning recommendations given in the national and international dosimetry protocols, an additional uncertainty in the range of 0.2%-0.6% is present. According to the IAEA TRS-398 protocol, the uncertainty in clinical electron dosimetry using parallel-plate ion chambers is 1.7%. This study may help to reduce this uncertainty significantly.

Citing Articles

Dosimetric impact of calibration coefficients determined using linear accelerator photon and electron beams for ionization chamber in an on-site dosimetry audit.

Tani K, Wakita A, Tohyama N, Fujita Y J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(5):619-627.

PMID: 39154377 PMC: 11420846. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae054.


A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration.

Mahfirotin D, Ferliano B, Handika A, Asril Y, Fadli M, Ryangga D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 25(1):e14232.

PMID: 38088260 PMC: 10795448. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14232.


Experimental investigation of the effective point of measurement for plane-parallel chambers used in electron beam dosimetry.

Yasui K, Nakajima Y, Suda Y, Arai Y, Takizawa T, Sakai K J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(7):e14059.

PMID: 37307247 PMC: 10338742. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14059.


Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties.

Elbashir F, Ksouri W, Eisa M, Alanazi S, Habbani F, Sulieman A Life (Basel). 2022; 12(1).

PMID: 35054424 PMC: 8781094. DOI: 10.3390/life12010031.


Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.

Baumann K, Horst F, Zink K, Goma C Med Phys. 2019; 46(10):4639-4653.

PMID: 31350915 PMC: 6851981. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13737.