» Articles » PMID: 22407152

Surgical Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Results of a 2-year Prospective Multicenter Survey in Belgium

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered nowadays as the standard management of acute cholecystitis (AC). However, results from multicentric studies in the general surgical community are still lacking.

Methods: A prospective multicenter survey of surgical management of AC patients was conducted over a 2-year period in Belgium. Operative features and patients' clinical outcome were recorded. The impact of independent predictive factors on the choice of surgical approach, the risk of conversion, and the occurrence of postoperative complications was studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Fifty-three surgeons consecutively and anonymously included 1,089 patients in this prospective study. A primary open approach was chosen in 74 patients (6.8%), whereas a laparoscopic approach was the first option in 1,015 patients (93.2%). Independent predictive factors for a primary open approach were previous history of upper abdominal surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.13, p < 0.001], patient age greater than 70 years (OR 2.41, p < 0.05), surgeon with more than 10 years' experience (OR 2.08, p = 0.005), and gangrenous cholecystitis (OR 1.71, p < 0.05). In the laparoscopy group, 116 patients (11.4%) required conversion to laparotomy. Overall, 38 patients (3.5%) presented biliary complications and 49 had other local complications (4.5%). Incidence of bile duct injury was 1.2% in the whole series, 2.7% in the open group, and 1.1% in the laparoscopy group. Sixty patients had general complications (5.5%). The overall mortality rate was 0.8%. All patients who died were in poor general condition [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III or IV].

Conclusions: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently considered as the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, an open approach is still a valid option in more advanced disease. However, overall mortality and incidence of bile duct injury remain high.

Citing Articles

LapBot-Safe Chole: validation of an artificial intelligence-powered mobile game app to teach safe cholecystectomy.

St John A, Khalid M, Masino C, Noroozi M, Alseidi A, Hashimoto D Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(9):5274-5284.

PMID: 39009730 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11068-3.


Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainee surgeons with different cholangiographic techniques (SCOTCH): a prospective non-randomized trial on the impact of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed....

Ortenzi M, Corallino D, Botteri E, Balla A, Arezzo A, Sartori A Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(2):1045-1058.

PMID: 38135732 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10613-w.


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Any time is a good time.

Wani H, Meher S, Srinivasulu U, Mohanty L, Modi M, Ibrarullah M Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023; 27(3):271-276.

PMID: 37088998 PMC: 10472128. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-127.


An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01).

Nakanuma H, Endo Y, Fujinaga A, Kawamura M, Kawasaki T, Masuda T Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(3):1933-1942.

PMID: 36261644 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09678-w.


Learning curve for the surgical time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees using the three-port method: how many cases are needed for stabilization?.

Komatsu M, Yokoyama N, Katada T, Sato D, Otani T, Harada R Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(2):1252-1261.

PMID: 36171452 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09666-0.


References
1.
Horiuchi A, Watanabe Y, Doi T, Sato K, Yukumi S, Yoshida M . Delayed laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with severe fibrotic adhesions. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(12):2720-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9879-y. View

2.
Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, Cohen A, ABRAHAMSON J, Eldar S . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14(8):755-60. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000182. View

3.
Yol S, Kartal A, Vatansev C, Aksoy F, Toy H . Sex as a factor in conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. JSLS. 2007; 10(3):359-63. PMC: 3015697. View

4.
Hubert C, Annet L, Van Beers B, Gigot J . The "inside approach of the gallbladder" is an alternative to the classic Calot's triangle dissection for a safe operation in severe cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(10):2626-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0966-5. View

5.
David G, Al-Sarira A, Willmott S, Deakin M, Corless D, Slavin J . Management of acute gallbladder disease in England. Br J Surg. 2007; 95(4):472-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5984. View