» Articles » PMID: 22405632

Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: the TARGET Study: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2012 Mar 13
PMID 22405632
Citations 208
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to assess the impact of targeted left ventricular (LV) lead placement on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Background: Placement of the LV lead to the latest sites of contraction and away from the scar confers the best response to CRT. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to compare a targeted approach to LV lead placement with usual care.

Methods: A total of 220 patients scheduled for CRT underwent baseline echocardiographic speckle-tracking 2-dimensional radial strain imaging and were then randomized 1:1 into 2 groups. In group 1 (TARGET [Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]), the LV lead was positioned at the latest site of peak contraction with an amplitude of >10% to signify freedom from scar. In group 2 (control) patients underwent standard unguided CRT. Patients were classified by the relationship of the LV lead to the optimal site as concordant (at optimal site), adjacent (within 1 segment), or remote (≥2 segments away). The primary endpoint was a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were clinical response (≥1 improvement in New York Heart Association functional class), all-cause mortality, and combined all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization.

Results: The groups were balanced at randomization. In the TARGET group, there was a greater proportion of responders at 6 months (70% vs. 55%, p = 0.031), giving an absolute difference in the primary endpoint of 15% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 28%). Compared with controls, TARGET patients had a higher clinical response (83% vs. 65%, p = 0.003) and lower rates of the combined endpoint (log-rank test, p = 0.031).

Conclusions: Compared with standard CRT treatment, the use of speckle-tracking echocardiography to the target LV lead placement yields significantly improved response and clinical status and lower rates of combined death and heart failure-related hospitalization. (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [TARGET] study); ISRCTN19717943).

Citing Articles

Optimizing outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy: what do recent data and insights say?.

de Vere F, Wijesuriya N, Howell S, Elliott M, Mehta V, Mannakkara N Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2024; 1-18.

PMID: 39695920 PMC: 11716670. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2024.2445246.


[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].

Richter S, Lemke B Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024; 35(4):256-262.

PMID: 39557652 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6.


Transforming Heart Failure Management: The Power of Strain Imaging, 3D Imaging, and Vortex Analysis in Echocardiography.

Galzerano D, Savo M, Castaldi B, Kholaif N, Khaliel F, Pozza A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407819 PMC: 11476592. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195759.


Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Who Undergo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Narrative Review.

Antoniou N, Kalaitzoglou M, Tsigkriki L, Baroutidou A, Tsaousidis A, Koulaouzidis G Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893704 PMC: 11171556. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111178.


Is interventional technique better than the traditional over-the-wire method for left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy?.

Jakobsen F, Sandgaard N, Olsen T, Brandes A, Djurhuus M, Schaeffer M Heart Rhythm O2. 2024; 5(5):281-288.

PMID: 38840765 PMC: 11148483. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.04.001.