» Articles » PMID: 22401817

Optimally Porous and Biomechanically Compatible Scaffolds for Large-area Bone Regeneration

Overview
Date 2012 Mar 10
PMID 22401817
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large-area or critical-sized bone defects pose a serious challenge in orthopedic surgery, as all current treatment options present with shortcomings. Bone tissue engineering offers a more promising alternative treatment strategy. However, this approach requires mechanically stable scaffolds that support homogenous bone formation throughout the scaffold thickness. Despite advances in scaffold fabrication, current scaffold-based techniques are unable to support uniform, three-dimensional bone regeneration, and are limited to only the scaffold surface in vitro and in vivo. This is mainly because of inadequate scaffold pore sizes (<200 μm) and accessible pore volume, and the associated limited oxygen diffusion and vascular invasion. In this study, we have adopted a method combining microsphere-sintering and porogen-leaching techniques to fabricate scaffolds with an increased accessible pore volume. Of the scaffolds developed, moderately porous poly(85 lactide-co-15 glycolide) (PLGA) microsphere scaffolds were selected as most advantageous, since they retain mechanical strength in the range of human cancellous bone and display a significantly higher accessible pore volume, which is attributed to an increased percentage of larger pores (i.e., size range 200-600 μm). Unlike control scaffolds with a limited pore size and an accessible pore volume, moderately porous scaffolds displayed increased oxygen diffusion, pre-osteoblast cell infiltration, proliferation, and survival throughout the entire scaffold. Furthermore, moderately porous PLGA microsphere scaffolds displayed enhanced and homogenous mineralization in vitro. Since these newly designed moderately porous scaffolds are weight bearing, are fully osteoconductive, and have the ability to support vascularization, they may serve as effective scaffolds for large-area bone defect repair/regeneration. In addition, this study demonstrates the ability to modulate scaffold porosity and, in turn, to develop oxygen tension-controlled matrices that are effective for large-area bone regeneration.

Citing Articles

The paradigm of stem cell secretome in tissue repair and regeneration: Present and future perspectives.

Da Silva K, Kumar P, Choonara Y Wound Repair Regen. 2025; 33(1):e13251.

PMID: 39780313 PMC: 11711308. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13251.


Engineered Osteochondral Scaffolds with Bioactive Cartilage Zone for Enhanced Articular Cartilage Regeneration.

Golebiowska A, Intravaia J, Sathe V, Kumbar S, Nukavarapu S Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(3):597-611.

PMID: 39602036 PMC: 11835937. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03655-1.


Correction to "Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration".

Desai N, Pande S, Vora L, Kommineni N ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024; 7(9):6325-6331.

PMID: 39162584 PMC: 11409221. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.4c01057.


Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Desai N, Pande S, Vora L, Kommineni N ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024; 7(7):4270-4292.

PMID: 38950103 PMC: 11253102. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00613.


Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative therapies: Advances, challenges and clinical prospects.

Golebiowska A, Intravaia J, Sathe V, Kumbar S, Nukavarapu S Bioact Mater. 2023; 32:98-123.

PMID: 37927899 PMC: 10622743. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.09.017.


References
1.
Lord C, Gebhardt M, Tomford W, Mankin H . Infection in bone allografts. Incidence, nature, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(3):369-76. View

2.
Athanasiou K, Zhu C, Lanctot D, Agrawal C, Wang X . Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. Tissue Eng. 2000; 6(4):361-81. DOI: 10.1089/107632700418083. View

3.
Granet C, Laroche N, Vico L, Alexandre C, Lafage-Proust M . Rotating-wall vessels, promising bioreactors for osteoblastic cell culture: comparison with other 3D conditions. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999; 36(4):513-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02523224. View

4.
Viktorov I, Proshin S . Use of isopropyl alcohol in histological assays: dehydration of tissue, enbessing into paraffin, and processing of paraffin sections. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2003; 136(1):105-6. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026017719668. View

5.
Hutmacher D . Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2000; 21(24):2529-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6. View