» Articles » PMID: 9089406

Pore Size of Porous Hydroxyapatite As the Cell-substratum Controls BMP-induced Osteogenesis

Overview
Journal J Biochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1997 Feb 1
PMID 9089406
Citations 130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To elucidate the biochemical mechanism of osteogenesis, the effect of matrix geometry upon the osteogenesis induced by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) was studied. A series of five porous hydroxyapatites with different pore sizes, 106-212, 212-300, 300-400, 400-500, and 500-600 microns, was prepared. A block (approximately 5 x 5 x 1 mm, 40.0 mg) of each hydroxyapatite ceramics was combined with 4 micrograms of recombinant human BMP-2 and implanted subcutaneously into the back skin of rat. Osteoinductive ability of each implant was estimated by quantifying osteocalcin content and alkaline phosphatase activity in the implant up to 4 wk after implantation. In the ceramics of 106-212 microns, the highest alkaline phosphatase activity was found 2 wk after implantation, and the highest osteocalcin content 4 wk after implantation, consistent with the results observed with particulate porous hydroxyapatite [Kuboki, Y. et al. (1995) Connect. Tissue Res. 32: 219-226]. Comparison of the alkaline phosphatase activities at 2 wk and the osteocalcin contents at 4 wk after implantation revealed that the highest amount of bone was produced in the ceramics implants with pore size of 300-400 microns. In the ceramics with smaller or larger pore sizes, the amount of bone formation decreased as the pore size deviated from 300-400 microns. The results indicated that the optimal pore size for attachment, differentiation and growth of osteoblasts and vascularization is approximately 300-400 microns. This study using chemically identical but geometrically different cell substrata is the first demonstration that a matrix with a certain geometrical size is most favorable for cell differentiation.

Citing Articles

[Hydrodynamic finite element analysis of biological scaffolds with different pore sizes for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation].

Hu Y, Lyu W, Xia W, Liu Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 57(1):97-105.

PMID: 39856513 PMC: 11759801.


Determining the Permeability of Porous Bioceramic Scaffolds: Significance, Overview of Current Methods and Challenges Ahead.

Gabrieli R, Schiavi A, Baino F Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597346 PMC: 11595756. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225522.


Mechanical and Physical Characterization of a Biphasic 3D Printed Silk-Infilled Scaffold for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.

Braxton T, Lim K, Alcala-Orozco C, Joukhdar H, Rnjak-Kovacina J, Iqbal N ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024; 10(12):7606-7618.

PMID: 39589862 PMC: 11632666. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01865.


Digital Light Processing of F MRI-Traceable Gelatin-Based Biomaterial Inks towards Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Szabo A, Kolouchova K, Parmentier L, Herynek V, Groborz O, Van Vlierberghe S Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(12).

PMID: 38930365 PMC: 11206011. DOI: 10.3390/ma17122996.


Microstructure Optimization for Design of Porous Tantalum Scaffolds Based on Mechanical Properties and Permeability.

Wang Y, Qin X, Lv N, Gao L, Sun C, Tong Z Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(24).

PMID: 38138710 PMC: 10744872. DOI: 10.3390/ma16247568.