» Articles » PMID: 22389637

On Design and Implementation of Neural-Machine Interface for Artificial Legs

Overview
Date 2012 Mar 6
PMID 22389637
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The quality of life of leg amputees can be improved dramatically by using a cyber physical system (CPS) that controls artificial legs based on neural signals representing amputees' intended movements. The key to the CPS is the neural-machine interface (NMI) that senses electromyographic (EMG) signals to make control decisions. This paper presents a design and implementation of a novel NMI using an embedded computer system to collect neural signals from a physical system - a leg amputee, provide adequate computational capability to interpret such signals, and make decisions to identify user's intent for prostheses control in real time. A new deciphering algorithm, composed of an EMG pattern classifier and a post-processing scheme, was developed to identify the user's intended lower limb movements. To deal with environmental uncertainty, a trust management mechanism was designed to handle unexpected sensor failures and signal disturbances. Integrating the neural deciphering algorithm with the trust management mechanism resulted in a highly accurate and reliable software system for neural control of artificial legs. The software was then embedded in a newly designed hardware platform based on an embedded microcontroller and a graphic processing unit (GPU) to form a complete NMI for real time testing. Real time experiments on a leg amputee subject and an able-bodied subject have been carried out to test the control accuracy of the new NMI. Our extensive experiments have shown promising results on both subjects, paving the way for clinical feasibility of neural controlled artificial legs.

Citing Articles

Electromyography-Based Control of Lower Limb Prostheses: A Systematic Review.

Ahkami B, Ahmed K, Thesleff A, Hargrove L, Ortiz-Catalan M IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2023; 5(3):547-562.

PMID: 37655190 PMC: 10470657. DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2023.3282325.


Noninvasive Human-Prosthesis Interfaces for Locomotion Intent Recognition: A Review.

Xu D, Wang Q Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022; 2021:9863761.

PMID: 36285130 PMC: 9494705. DOI: 10.34133/2021/9863761.


Design and Speed-Adaptive Control of a Powered Geared Five-Bar Prosthetic Knee Using BP Neural Network Gait Recognition.

Sun Y, Huang R, Zheng J, Dong D, Chen X, Bai L Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(21).

PMID: 31717856 PMC: 6864863. DOI: 10.3390/s19214662.


Implementation of Hand Gesture Recognition Device Applicable to Smart Watch Based on Flexible Epidermal Tactile Sensor Array.

Byun S, Lee S Micromachines (Basel). 2019; 10(10).

PMID: 31614813 PMC: 6843450. DOI: 10.3390/mi10100692.


A real-time, practical sensor fault-tolerant module for robust EMG pattern recognition.

Zhang X, Huang H J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12:18.

PMID: 25888946 PMC: 4342209. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0011-y.


References
1.
Xiao W, Huang H, Sun Y, Yang Q . Promise of embedded system with GPU in artificial leg control: enabling time-frequency feature extraction from electromyography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:6926-9. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333633. View

2.
Huang H, Zhang F, Sun Y, He H . Design of a robust EMG sensing interface for pattern classification. J Neural Eng. 2010; 7(5):056005. PMC: 2956305. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056005. View

3.
Huang H, Kuiken T, Lipschutz R . A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 56(1):65-73. PMC: 3025288. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2003293. View

4.
Potter B, Scoville C . Amputation is not isolated: an overview of the US Army Amputee Patient Care Program and associated amputee injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(10 Spec No.):S188-90. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200600001-00041. View

5.
Parker P, Scott R . Myoelectric control of prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1986; 13(4):283-310. View