» Articles » PMID: 20811091

Design of a Robust EMG Sensing Interface for Pattern Classification

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2010 Sep 3
PMID 20811091
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) pattern classification has been widely investigated for neural control of external devices in order to assist with movements of patients with motor deficits. Classification performance deteriorates due to inevitable disturbances to the sensor interface, which significantly challenges the clinical value of this technique. This study aimed to design a sensor fault detection (SFD) module in the sensor interface to provide reliable EMG pattern classification. This module monitored the recorded signals from individual EMG electrodes and performed a self-recovery strategy to recover the classification performance when one or more sensors were disturbed. To evaluate this design, we applied synthetic disturbances to EMG signals collected from leg muscles of able-bodied subjects and a subject with a transfemoral amputation and compared the accuracies for classifying transitions between different locomotion modes with and without the SFD module. The results showed that the SFD module maintained classification performance when one signal was distorted and recovered about 20% of classification accuracy when four signals were distorted simultaneously. The method was simple to implement. Additionally, these outcomes were observed for all subjects, including the leg amputee, which implies the promise of the designed sensor interface for providing a reliable neural-machine interface for artificial legs.

Citing Articles

SonoMyoNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Predicting Isometric Force from Highly Sparse Ultrasound Images.

Kamatham A, Alzamani M, Dockum A, Sikdar S, Mukherjee B IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2024; 54(3):317-324.

PMID: 38974222 PMC: 11225932. DOI: 10.1109/thms.2024.3389690.


Ambulation Mode Classification of Individuals with Transfemoral Amputation through A-Mode Sonomyography and Convolutional Neural Networks.

Murray R, Mendez J, Gabert L, Fey N, Liu H, Lenzi T Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36502055 PMC: 9736589. DOI: 10.3390/s22239350.


Noninvasive Human-Prosthesis Interfaces for Locomotion Intent Recognition: A Review.

Xu D, Wang Q Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022; 2021:9863761.

PMID: 36285130 PMC: 9494705. DOI: 10.34133/2021/9863761.


Myoelectric control of robotic lower limb prostheses: a review of electromyography interfaces, control paradigms, challenges and future directions.

Fleming A, Stafford N, Huang S, Hu X, Ferris D, Huang H J Neural Eng. 2021; 18(4).

PMID: 34229307 PMC: 8694273. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac1176.


Machine Learning Approaches for Activity Recognition and/or Activity Prediction in Locomotion Assistive Devices-A Systematic Review.

Labarriere F, Thomas E, Calistri L, Optasanu V, Gueugnon M, Ornetti P Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(21).

PMID: 33172158 PMC: 7664393. DOI: 10.3390/s20216345.


References
1.
Sensinger J, Lock B, Kuiken T . Adaptive pattern recognition of myoelectric signals: exploration of conceptual framework and practical algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009; 17(3):270-8. PMC: 3025709. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2023282. View

2.
Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B . Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006; 16(6):541-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.08.006. View

3.
Micera S, Sabatini A, Dario P, Rossi B . A hybrid approach to EMG pattern analysis for classification of arm movements using statistical and fuzzy techniques. Med Eng Phys. 1999; 21(5):303-11. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(99)00055-7. View

4.
Varol H, Sup F, Goldfarb M . Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 57(3):542-51. PMC: 2829115. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2034734. View

5.
Kuiken T . Targeted reinnervation for improved prosthetic function. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006; 17(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.10.001. View