» Articles » PMID: 22389577

Money Matters: Cost Effectiveness of Juvenile Drug Court with and Without Evidence-Based Treatments

Overview
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Date 2012 Mar 6
PMID 22389577
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 12-month cost effectiveness of juvenile drug court and evidence-based treatments within Court were compared with traditional Family Court for 128 substance abusing/dependent juvenile offenders participating in a four-condition randomized trial. Intervention conditions included Family Court with community services (FC), Drug Court with community services (DC), Drug Court with Multisystemic Therapy (DC/MST), and Drug Court with MST enhanced with a contingency management program (DC/MST/CM). Average cost effectiveness ratios for substance use and criminal behavior outcomes revealed that economic efficiency in achieving outcomes generally improved from FC to DC, with the addition of evidence-based treatments improving efficiency in obtaining substance use outcomes.

Citing Articles

Cost and cost-effectiveness of abstinence contingent wage supplements.

Orme S, Zarkin G, Luckey J, Dunlap L, Novak M, Holtyn A Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023; 244:109754.

PMID: 36638680 PMC: 10207811. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109754.


Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.

Edmunds K, Wall L, Brown S, Searles A, Shakeshaft A, Doran C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(10).

PMID: 34065813 PMC: 8150417. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105097.


Juvenile Drug Treatment Court.

Ledgerwood D, Cunningham P Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019; 66(6):1193-1202.

PMID: 31679607 PMC: 6938235. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.08.011.


Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.

MacArthur G, Caldwell D, Redmore J, Watkins S, Kipping R, White J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10:CD009927.

PMID: 30288738 PMC: 6517301. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.


Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.

Edmunds K, Ling R, Shakeshaft A, Doran C, Searles A BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):660.

PMID: 30139384 PMC: 6108123. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3450-x.


References
1.
Lewinsohn P, Rohde P, Seeley J . Major depressive disorder in older adolescents: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998; 18(7):765-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00010-5. View

2.
. Involvement by young drivers in fatal motor-vehicle crashes--United States, 1988-1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996; 45(48):1049-53. View

3.
Fergusson D, Horwood L, Swain-Campbell N . Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young adulthood. Addiction. 2002; 97(9):1123-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00103.x. View

4.
Lehman A, Dixon L, Hoch J, Deforge B, Kernan E, Frank R . Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1999; 174:346-52. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.174.4.346. View

5.
Rosenheck R, Neale M . Cost-effectiveness of intensive psychiatric community care for high users of inpatient services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998; 55(5):459-66. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.5.459. View