» Articles » PMID: 18172769

Estimating the Differential Costs of Criminal Activity for Juvenile Drug Court Participants: Challenges and Recommendations

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Jan 4
PMID 18172769
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Juvenile drug court (JDC) programs have expanded rapidly over the past 20 years and are an increasingly popular option for rehabilitating juvenile offenders with substance use problems. Given the high cost of crime to society, an important economic question is whether and to what extent JDC programs reduce criminal activity among juvenile offenders. To address this question, the present study added an economic cost analysis to an ongoing randomized trial of JDC conducted in Charleston, South Carolina. Four treatment conditions were included in the parent study: Family Court with usual community-based treatment (FC, the comparison group), Drug Court with usual community-based treatment (DC), DC with Multisystemic Therapy (DC/MST), and DC/MST enhanced with Contingency Management (DC/MST/CM). The economic study estimated the cost of criminal activity for nine specific crimes at baseline (pretreatment) and 4 and 12 months thereafter. A number of methodological challenges were encountered, suggesting that it may be more difficult to economically quantify frequency and type of criminal activity for adolescents than for adults. The present paper addresses methodological approaches and challenges, and proposes guidelines for future economic evaluations of adolescent substance abuse and crime prevention programs.

Citing Articles

Unit Costs of Delinquent Acts for Use in Economic Evaluations.

Reckers-Droog V, Goorden M, Dijkgraaf M, Van Eeren H, McCollister K, Roijen L J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2019; 22(2):71-79.

PMID: 31319377 PMC: 6839943.


Economic Evaluation of the Juvenile Drug Court/Reclaiming Futures (JDC/RF) Model.

McCollister K, Baumer P, Davis M, Greene A, Stevens S, Dennis M J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018; 45(3):321-339.

PMID: 29582233 PMC: 5970063. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-018-9606-y.


Are Non-Pharmacological Interventions Effective in Reducing Drug Use and Criminality? A Systematic and Meta-Analytical Review with an Economic Appraisal of These Interventions.

Perry A, Woodhouse R, Neilson M, Martyn St James M, Glanville J, Hewitt C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(10).

PMID: 27690077 PMC: 5086705. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13100966.


A randomized trial to identify accurate and cost-effective fidelity measurement methods for cognitive-behavioral therapy: project FACTS study protocol.

Beidas R, Maclean J, Fishman J, Dorsey S, Schoenwald S, Mandell D BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16(1):323.

PMID: 27633780 PMC: 5025620. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1034-z.


The cost-effectiveness of family/family-based therapy for treatment of externalizing disorders, substance use disorders and delinquency: a systematic review.

Goorden M, Schawo S, Bouwmans-Frijters C, van der Schee E, Hendriks V, Roijen L BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16:237.

PMID: 27412612 PMC: 4944475. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0949-8.


References
1.
Miller T, Cohen M, Rossman S . Victim costs of violent crime and resulting injuries. Health Aff (Millwood). 1993; 12(4):186-97. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.4.186. View

2.
Petry N . A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 58(1-2):9-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00071-x. View

3.
Manning W, Basu A, Mullahy J . Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J Health Econ. 2005; 24(3):465-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011. View

4.
. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement : Preventing Violence and Related Health-Risking, Social Behaviors in Adolescents, October 13-15, 2004. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006; 34(4):457-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-006-9043-x. View

5.
McCollister K, French M . The relative contribution of outcome domains in the total economic benefit of addiction interventions: a review of first findings. Addiction. 2003; 98(12):1647-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00541.x. View