» Articles » PMID: 22355561

Commercial Teas Highlight Plant DNA Barcode Identification Successes and Obstacles

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2012 Feb 23
PMID 22355561
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Appearance does not easily identify the dried plant fragments used to prepare teas to species. Here we test recovery of standard DNA barcodes for land plants from a large array of commercial tea products and analyze their performance in identifying tea constituents using existing databases. Most (90%) of 146 tea products yielded rbcL or matK barcodes using a standard protocol. Matching DNA identifications to listed ingredients was limited by incomplete databases for the two markers, shared or nearly identical barcodes among some species, and lack of standard common names for plant species. About 1/3 of herbal teas generated DNA identifications not found on labels. Broad scale adoption of plant DNA barcoding may require algorithms that place search results in context of standard plant names and character-based keys for distinguishing closely-related species. Demonstrating the importance of accessible plant barcoding, our findings indicate unlisted ingredients are common in herbal teas.

Citing Articles

Chloroplast genome characterization of Uncaria guianensis and Uncaria tomentosa and evolutive dynamics of the Cinchonoideae subfamily.

Castro A, Nunes R, Carvalho L, Targueta C, Dos Santos Braga-Ferreira R, Melo-Ximenes A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8390.

PMID: 37225737 PMC: 10209157. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34334-1.


Advancements and future prospective of DNA barcodes in the herbal drug industry.

Mahima K, Sunil Kumar K, Rakhesh K, Rajeswaran P, Sharma A, Sathishkumar R Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:947512.

PMID: 36339543 PMC: 9635000. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.947512.


The specific DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identification of plants.

Jiang S, Chen F, Qin P, Xie H, Peng G, Li Y Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2022; 28(4):837-848.

PMID: 35592487 PMC: 9110604. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-022-01175-7.


Quantification of adulteration in traded ayurvedic raw drugs employing machine learning approaches with DNA barcode database.

Dev S, Unnikrishnan R, Jayaraj R, Sujanapal P, Anitha V 3 Biotech. 2021; 11(11):463.

PMID: 34745814 PMC: 8523608. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-021-03001-5.


DNA Barcoding Mushroom Spawn Using EF-1α Barcodes: A Case Study in Oyster Mushrooms ().

Zhao P, Ji S, Cheng X, Bau T, Dong H, Gao X Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:624347.

PMID: 34093459 PMC: 8176306. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.624347.


References
1.
Little D, Stevenson D . A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics. 2021; 23(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00126.x. View

2.
Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L . Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1):e8613. PMC: 2799520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613. View

3.
Seberg O, Petersen G . How many loci does it take to DNA barcode a crocus?. PLoS One. 2009; 4(2):e4598. PMC: 2643479. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004598. View

4.
Lou S, Wong K, Li M, But P, Tsui S, Shaw P . An integrated web medicinal materials DNA database: MMDBD (Medicinal Materials DNA Barcode Database). BMC Genomics. 2010; 11:402. PMC: 2996930. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-402. View

5.
Kumana C, Ng M, Lin H, Ko W, Wu P, Todd D . Herbal tea induced hepatic veno-occlusive disease: quantification of toxic alkaloid exposure in adults. Gut. 1985; 26(1):101-4. PMC: 1432401. DOI: 10.1136/gut.26.1.101. View