» Articles » PMID: 18258745

DNA Barcoding the Floras of Biodiversity Hotspots

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Feb 9
PMID 18258745
Citations 219
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA barcoding is a technique in which species identification is performed by using DNA sequences from a small fragment of the genome, with the aim of contributing to a wide range of ecological and conservation studies in which traditional taxonomic identification is not practical. DNA barcoding is well established in animals, but there is not yet any universally accepted barcode for plants. Here, we undertook intensive field collections in two biodiversity hotspots (Mesoamerica and southern Africa). Using >1,600 samples, we compared eight potential barcodes. Going beyond previous plant studies, we assessed to what extent a "DNA barcoding gap" is present between intra- and interspecific variations, using multiple accessions per species. Given its adequate rate of variation, easy amplification, and alignment, we identified a portion of the plastid matK gene as a universal DNA barcode for flowering plants. Critically, we further demonstrate the applicability of DNA barcoding for biodiversity inventories. In addition, analyzing >1,000 species of Mesoamerican orchids, DNA barcoding with matK alone reveals cryptic species and proves useful in identifying species listed in Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species (CITES) appendixes.

Citing Articles

DNA barcoding of geographical indication tagged Byadagi chilli and its cultivars using ITS2, matK and rbcL coding sequences.

Meghana B, Reshma S Mol Biol Rep. 2025; 52(1):286.

PMID: 40047956 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10379-5.


Insights from DNA Barcodes-Based Phylogenetic Analysis of Medicinal Plants and Estimation of Their Conservation Status: A Case Study in the Tianshan Wild Forest, China.

Jiamahate A, Bozorov T, Wang J, Zhang J, Zhang H, Wang X Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39795359 PMC: 11723300. DOI: 10.3390/plants14010099.


Molecular identification, genetic diversity, and secondary structure predictions of Physalis species using ITS2 DNA barcoding.

Pere K, Mburu K, Muge E, Wagacha J, Nyaboga E BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):1178.

PMID: 39695366 PMC: 11653582. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05889-6.


Delimiting species, revealing cryptic diversity in Molytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) weevil through DNA barcoding.

Ren J, Zhang R J Insect Sci. 2024; 24(4).

PMID: 39348593 PMC: 11441576. DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae083.


Amphistomes.

Ghatani S, VeenaTandon Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1454:323-347.

PMID: 39008270 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-60121-7_9.


References
1.
Ebach M, Holdrege C . DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature. 2005; 434(7034):697. DOI: 10.1038/434697b. View

2.
Hilu K, Borsch T, Muller K, Soltis D, Soltis P, Savolainen V . Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. Am J Bot. 2011; 90(12):1758-76. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.12.1758. View

3.
Chang C, Lin H, Lin I, Chow T, Chen H, Chen W . The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 23(2):279-91. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj029. View

4.
Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou L, Powell M, Grayer R, Chase M . Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2011; 89(1):132-44. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.1.132. View

5.
Fontaneto D, Herniou E, Boschetti C, Caprioli M, Melone G, Ricci C . Independently evolving species in asexual bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(4):e87. PMC: 1828144. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050087. View