» Articles » PMID: 22344576

Certolizumab Pegol Plus MTX Administered Every 4 Weeks is Effective in Patients with RA Who Are Partial Responders to MTX

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2012 Feb 21
PMID 22344576
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is known to be effective as monotherapy at a dosage of 400  mg every 4 weeks in patients with active RA who have failed DMARDs. The aim of this study was to investigate every 4-week CZP in addition to continued MTX therapy in patients with an inadequate response to MTX alone.

Methods: Patients with active RA with inadequate response to MTX, on background MTX, were randomized to double-blind treatment with CZP 400  mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (NCT00544154). The primary efficacy end-point was the ACR 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at Week 24. Other end-points included ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, ACR core components, 28-joint DAS (ESR) with three variables (DAS28-3) and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in addition to safety.

Results: Of 247 randomized patients, 126 received CZP and 121 received placebo, in addition to MTX. ACR20 response rates were 45.9 vs 22.9%, respectively [P < 0.001 analysed by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method], with improvements being apparent from Week 1. Statistically significant improvements over placebo were seen with CZP for ACR50, ACR core components, DAS28-3 and physical functioning. Rates of treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (25.0 vs 27.7%), and there were no deaths or serious opportunistic infections.

Conclusion: CZP 400  mg every 4 weeks plus MTX demonstrated a favourable risk-benefit profile with rapid onset of action in RA patients with an inadequate response to an earlier MTX therapy.

Citing Articles

Influence of rheumatoid factor levels and TNF inhibitor structure on secondary nonresponse in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Plasencia-Rodriguez C, Martinez-Feito A, Novella-Navarro M, de Diego R, Bonilla G, Gehin J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1461396.

PMID: 39296891 PMC: 11410080. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1461396.


Estimating Patient-Specific Relative Benefit of Adding Biologics to Conventional Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

Luo Y, Chalkou K, Funada S, Salanti G, Furukawa T JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2321398.

PMID: 37389866 PMC: 10314313. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21398.


Assessing Immunogenicity of Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Progress Towards Personalized Medicine.

Gehin J, Goll G, Brun M, Jani M, Bolstad N, Syversen S BioDrugs. 2022; 36(6):731-748.

PMID: 36315391 PMC: 9649489. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00559-1.


Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials.

Singh J, Gsteiger S, Wheaton L, Riley R, Abrams K, Gillies C BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022; 22(1):186.

PMID: 35818035 PMC: 9275254. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01657-y.


Lessons From the Success and Failure of Targeted Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Perspectives for Effective Basic and Translational Research.

Kim M, Choe Y, Lee S Immune Netw. 2022; 22(1):e8.

PMID: 35291656 PMC: 8901706. DOI: 10.4110/in.2022.22.e8.