» Articles » PMID: 22332805

Processing of Emotional Distraction is Both Automatic and Modulated by Attention: Evidence from an Event-related FMRI Investigation

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Feb 16
PMID 22332805
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditionally, emotional stimuli have been thought to be automatically processed via a bottom-up automatic "capture of attention" mechanism. Recently, this view has been challenged by evidence that emotion processing depends on the availability of attentional resources. Although these two views are not mutually exclusive, direct evidence reconciling them is lacking. One limitation of previous investigations supporting the traditional or competing views is that they have not systematically investigated the impact of emotional charge of task-irrelevant distraction in conjunction with manipulations of attentional demands. Using event-related fMRI, we investigated the nature of emotion-cognition interactions in a perceptual discrimination task with emotional distraction by manipulating both the emotional charge of the distracting information and the demands of the main task. Our findings show that emotion processing is both automatic and modulated by attention, but emotion and attention were only found to interact when finer assessments of emotional charge (comparison of most vs. least emotional conditions) were considered along with an effective manipulation of processing load (high vs. low). The study also identified brain regions reflecting the detrimental impact of emotional distraction on performance as well as regions involved in coping with such distraction. Activity in the dorsomedial pFC and ventrolateral pFC was linked to a detrimental impact of emotional distraction, whereas the dorsal ACC and lateral occipital cortex were involved in helping with emotional distraction. These findings demonstrate that task-irrelevant emotion processing is subjective to both the emotional content of distraction and the level of attentional demand.

Citing Articles

The impact of fear of pain on the temporal processing of emotional faces: modulation of attentional resources.

Zheng P, Lyu Z Cogn Process. 2024; .

PMID: 39499392 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01243-8.


Multi-level processing of emotions in life motion signals revealed through pupil responses.

Yuan T, Wang L, Jiang Y Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39401063 PMC: 11473101. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89873.


Altered Functional Activity and Functional Connectivity of Seed Regions Based on ALFF Following Acupuncture Treatment in Patients with Stroke Sequelae with Unilateral Limb Numbness.

Peng J, Su J, Song L, Lv Q, Gao Y, Chang J Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023; 19:233-245.

PMID: 36744205 PMC: 9890273. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S391616.


In exogenous attention, time is the clue: Brain and heart interactions to survive threatening stimuli.

Ruiz-Padial E, Mercado F PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0243117.

PMID: 33979346 PMC: 8115771. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243117.


Natural sleep loss is associated with lower mPFC activity during negative distracter processing.

Dimitrov A, Nowak J, Ligdorf A, Oei N, Adli M, Walter H Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021; 21(1):242-253.

PMID: 33469886 PMC: 7994230. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00862-w.


References
1.
Holzel B, Ott U, Hempel H, Hackl A, Wolf K, Stark R . Differential engagement of anterior cingulate and adjacent medial frontal cortex in adept meditators and non-meditators. Neurosci Lett. 2007; 421(1):16-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.074. View

2.
Morris J, Frith C, Perrett D, Rowland D, Young A, Calder A . A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions. Nature. 1996; 383(6603):812-5. DOI: 10.1038/383812a0. View

3.
Lavie N . Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(3):451-68. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451. View

4.
Schupp H, Ohman A, Junghofer M, Weike A, Stockburger J, Hamm A . The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion. 2004; 4(2):189-200. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189. View

5.
Phan K, Fitzgerald D, Gao K, Moore G, Tancer M, Posse S . Real-time fMRI of cortico-limbic brain activity during emotional processing. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(3):527-32. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200403010-00029. View