Directly Measured Mucosal Pressures Produced by the I-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Paralysed Anaesthetised Patients
Overview
Affiliations
The i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ are extraglottic airway devices with non-inflatable and inflatable cuffs, respectively. We hypothesised that directly measured mucosal pressures would differ between these devices in anesthetised paralysed patients. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to receive one of these two devices. Four pressure sensors were attached to all airway devices used to measure mucosal pressure at the base of the tongue, the distal oropharynx, the hypopharynx and the pyriform fossa. At these four places, median (IQR [range]) i-gel mucosal pressures were 8.0 (2.7-10.7 [0-26.7]), 5.0 (2.7-7 [1.0-37.3]), 9.3 (2.7-13.3 [0-22.7] and 8.0 (2.7-10.7 [0-25.3]) cmH(2)O, respectively, and for the LMA Supreme, these were 5.0 (0.5-8.0 [0-33]), 4.0 (1.3-9.3 [0-24]), 10.7 (4-17.3 [0-26.7]) and 8.0 (0-10.7 [0-36]) cmH(2)O, respectively. Mucosal pressures were low and similar for both devices. The LMA Supreme mucosal pressures were higher in the hypopharynx than in the distal oropharynx (p = 0.04) and base of the tongue (p = 0.011). There were no pressure differences between the locations for the i-gel.
Deepak G, Kumar R, Agarwal M, Bharadwaj M, Kumar N, Sarma R Indian J Anaesth. 2021; 65(6):439-444.
PMID: 34248186 PMC: 8252994. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_189_21.
Chang J, Kim H, Lee J, Min S, Won D, Jun K BMC Anesthesiol. 2019; 19(1):118.
PMID: 31272379 PMC: 6610917. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0785-8.
Kimijima T, Edanaga M, Yamakage M J Anesth. 2018; 32(5):655-662.
PMID: 30022284 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-2531-7.
Damodaran S, Sethi S, Malhotra S, Samra T, Maitra S, Saini V Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11(4):390-395.
PMID: 29033717 PMC: 5637413. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_149_17.
Kriege M, Alflen C, Eisel J, Ott T, Piepho T, Noppens R BMC Anesthesiol. 2017; 17(1):19.
PMID: 28152975 PMC: 5290637. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0308-4.