» Articles » PMID: 26783527

Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Jan 20
PMID 26783527
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Supraglottic airway devices are routinely used for airway maintenance in elective surgical procedures where aspiration is not a significant risk and also as rescue devices in difficult airway management. Some devices now have features mitigating risk of aspiration, such as drain tubes or compartments to manage regurgitated content. Despite this, the use of these device may be associated with various complications including aspiration. This review highlights the types and incidence of these complications. They include regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents, compression of vascular structures, trauma, and nerve injury. The incidence of such complications is quite low, but as some carry with them a significant degree of morbidity the need to follow manufacturers' advice is underlined. The incidence of gastric content aspiration associated with the devices is estimated to be as low as 0.02% with perioperative regurgitation being significantly higher but underreported. Other serious, but extremely rare, complications include pharyngeal rupture, pneumomediastinum, mediastinitis, or arytenoid dislocation. Mild short-lasting adverse effects of the devices have significantly higher incidence than serious complications and involve postoperative sore throat, dysphagia, pain on swallowing, or hoarseness. Devices may have deleterious effect on cervical mucosa or vasculature depending on their cuff volume and pressure.

Citing Articles

Superiority of the Bag-Valve-Guedel Adaptor Over the Standard Face Mask for Preintubation Ventilation of Bearded Patients by Trainees With Limited Experience: Prospective Controlled Cross-Over Clinical Trial.

Gavish L, Firman S, Orjuela Cruz D, Tovim A, Gertz S, Gomez Barrantes R J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025; 6(1):100035.

PMID: 40012650 PMC: 11852698. DOI: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100035.


How does head position affect laryngeal vision with a video laryngeal mask airway?.

Castillo-Monzon C, Marroquin-Valz H, Gaszynski T, Cayuela M, Orozco J, Ratajczyk P Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1469225.

PMID: 39741507 PMC: 11686431. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1469225.


Choice of supraglottic airway devices: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Kanakaraj M, Bhat A, Singh N, Balasubramanian S, Tyagi A, Aathreya R Br J Anaesth. 2024; 133(6):1284-1306.

PMID: 39406569 PMC: 11589487. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.001.


The Effectiveness of the Gnana Laryngeal Mask Airway II (GLA-II) With Novel Suction Tubing in Gastrointestinal (GI) Cases.

Ahmadzadeh S, Johnson L, Barham W, Ilochi J, Fredericks M, Varrassi G Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69103.

PMID: 39391439 PMC: 11465952. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69103.


Application of placing the anterior end of endotracheal tube at the glottis in laryngeal mask airway positive ventilation during general anesthesia: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Chen Z, Ma X, Mao Z, Chen L, Chen Y, Shao D Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(39):e39934.

PMID: 39331888 PMC: 11441882. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039934.


References
1.
Keller C, Brimacombe J, Bittersohl J, Lirk P, von Goedecke A . Aspiration and the laryngeal mask airway: three cases and a review of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93(4):579-82. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh228. View

2.
Lee J, Kim M, Kim J, Byon H, Park Y, Kim H . A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67(6):606-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07072.x. View

3.
Roth H, Genzwuerker H, Rothhaas A, Finteis T, Schmeck J . The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube Suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005; 22(2):117-22. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021505000220. View

4.
Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M . Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-Gel with LMA-Proseal in Elective Surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2010; 53(3):302-5. PMC: 2900120. View

5.
Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya D . Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013; 31(5):266-73. DOI: 10.1097/01.EJA.0000435015.89651.3d. View