» Articles » PMID: 22311857

Is There an Optimal PH for Culture Media Used in Clinical IVF?

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 8
PMID 22311857
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Reducing environmental stress imposed upon gametes and embryos in the IVF laboratory is crucial in optimizing culture conditions and development. One environmental parameter of particular importance is external pH (pHe) of culture media. An optimal pHe has not been identified.

Methods: Electronic searches were performed using keywords focused on pH and the embryo using PUBMED through August 2011, with no limits placed on a beginning time. Examples of keywords include CO(2), bicarbonate and hydrogen ion. Relevant papers were then examined to obtain additional publications.

Results: Determining optimal pHe is problematic due to difficulty in isolating pHe from other variables, such as CO(2) and bicarbonate. Various commercial media companies recommend differing pHe ranges, most within the range of 7.2-7.4, with some companies recommending altering pHe based on the gamete or stage of the embryo. However, changing pHe during culture has not been experimentally shown to improve outcomes. Further complicating attempts to define an optimal pHe is that media components can impact intracellular pH (pHi). As a result, media with different concentrations of substances, such as lactate or amino acids, may have different pHi, despite being in the same pHe.

Conclusions: Due to the plasticity of embryos, a range of pHe's can support development, and defining an optimal pHe is difficult. It is unclear whether there is any benefit in changing pHe at various steps during IVF. The ideal pHe will likely vary from media to media and, until comparative studies have been performed isolating pHe, adherence to manufacturer recommendations and maintenance of a small acceptable pHe range are advisable.

Citing Articles

Towards homogenous multiwell plate based pH sensors using a responsive triangulenium dye and an ATTO-647 reference dye.

Wied M, Sorensen T RSC Adv. 2025; 15(2):1438-1446.

PMID: 39822565 PMC: 11736390. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra07949c.


Beyond Earth's bounds: navigating the frontiers of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in space.

Chaplia O, Mathyk B, Nichols-Burns S, Basar M, Halicigil C Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):123.

PMID: 39394617 PMC: 11468284. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01290-y.


Impact of Heat Stress on Oocyte Developmental Competence and Pre-Implantation Embryo Viability in Cattle.

Gomez-Guzman J, Parra-Bracamonte G, Velazquez M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123806 PMC: 11311040. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152280.


Assessment of artificial intelligence model and manual morphokinetic annotation system as embryo grading methods for successful live birth prediction: a retrospective monocentric study.

Papamentzelopoulou M, Prifti I, Mavrogianni D, Tseva T, Soyhan N, Athanasiou A Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):27.

PMID: 38443941 PMC: 10913268. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01198-7.


Influx of zwitterionic buffer after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) membrane piercing alters the transcriptome of human oocytes.

Mendola R, Biswas L, Schindler K, Walmsley R, Russell H, Angle M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1341-1356.

PMID: 38436798 PMC: 11143126. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03064-2.