Early (n170/m170) Face-sensitivity Despite Right Lateral Occipital Brain Damage in Acquired Prosopagnosia

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2012 Jan 26

PMID 22275889

Citations 17

Authors

Esther Alonso Prieto

Stephanie Caharel

Richard Henson

Bruno Rossion

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Compared to objects, pictures of faces elicit a larger early electromagnetic response at occipito-temporal sites on the human scalp, with an onset of 130 ms and a peak at about 170 ms. This N170 face effect is larger in the right than the left hemisphere and has been associated with the early categorization of the stimulus as a face. Here we tested whether this effect can be observed in the absence of some of the visual areas showing a preferential response to faces as typically identified in neuroimaging. Event-related potentials were recorded in response to faces, cars, and their phase-scrambled versions in a well-known brain-damaged case of prosopagnosia (PS). Despite the patient's right inferior occipital gyrus lesion encompassing the most posterior cortical area showing preferential response to faces ("occipital face area"), we identified an early face-sensitive component over the right occipito-temporal hemisphere of the patient that was identified as the N170. A second experiment supported this conclusion, showing the typical N170 increase of latency and amplitude in response to inverted faces. In contrast, there was no N170 in the left hemisphere, where PS has a lesion to the middle fusiform gyrus and shows no evidence of face-preferential response in neuroimaging (no left "fusiform face area"). These results were replicated by a magnetoencephalographic investigation of the patient, disclosing a M170 component only in the right hemisphere. These observations indicate that face-preferential activation in the inferior occipital cortex is not necessary to elicit early visual responses associated with face perception (N170/M170) on the human scalp. These results further suggest that when the right inferior occipital cortex is damaged, the integrity of the middle fusiform gyrus and/or the superior temporal sulcus - two areas showing face-preferential responses in the patient's right hemisphere - might be necessary to generate the N170 effect.

Citing Articles

Hypnotherapy modulating early and late event-related potentials components of face processing in social anxiety.

Zhang H, Xue X, Wen J, Li Y, Fan C, Ma L Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1449946.

PMID: 39493428 PMC: 11528304. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1449946.

Neural computations in prosopagnosia.

Faghel-Soubeyrand S, Richoz A, Waeber D, Woodhams J, Caldara R, Gosselin F Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(5.

PMID: 38795358 PMC: 11127037. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae211.

Subjectively salient faces differ from emotional faces: ERP evidence.

Zochowska A, Nowicka A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3634.

PMID: 38351111 PMC: 10864357. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54215-5.

Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to selectively modulate the face inversion effect and N170 event-related potentials.

Civile C, Waguri E, McLaren I Perception. 2023; 53(2):125-142.

PMID: 38018085 PMC: 10798030. DOI: 10.1177/03010066231215909.

Implicit evidence on the dissociation of identity and emotion recognition.

Passarelli M, Masini M, Chiorri C, Nurcis A, Daini R, Bracco F Cogn Process. 2021; 23(1):79-90.

PMID: 34618254 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-021-01061-2.

References

Halgren E, Raij T, Marinkovic K, Jousmaki V, Hari R . Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cereb Cortex. 2000; 10(1):69-81. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.1.69. View

Rossion B, Dricot L, Goebel R, Busigny T . Holistic face categorization in higher order visual areas of the normal and prosopagnosic brain: toward a non-hierarchical view of face perception. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 4:225. PMC: 3025660. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00225. View

Allison T, Ginter H, McCarthy G, Nobre A, Puce A, Luby M . Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1994; 71(2):821-5. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.2.821. View

Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Kirino E . Human face perception traced by magneto- and electro-encephalography. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999; 8(2):125-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00013-0. View

Kleinschmidt A, Cohen L . The neural bases of prosopagnosia and pure alexia: recent insights from functional neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006; 19(4):386-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000236619.89710.ee. View

Pitcher D, Walsh V, Yovel G, Duchaine B . TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(18):1568-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.063. View

Bobes M, Lopera F, Comas L, Galan L, Carbonell F, Bringas M . Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 21(7):691-718. DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000258. View

Jacques C, Rossion B . Early electrophysiological responses to multiple face orientations correlate with individual discrimination performance in humans. Neuroimage. 2007; 36(3):863-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.016. View

Horovitz S, Rossion B, Skudlarski P, Gore J . Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(4):1587-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.018. View

10.

Bentin S, Deouell L, Soroker N . Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroreport. 1999; 10(4):823-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199903170-00029. View

11.

Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G . Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 8(6):551-565. PMC: 2927138. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551. View

12.

Taulu S, Simola J . Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(7):1759-68. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008. View

13.

Atkinson A, Adolphs R . The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1571):1726-38. PMC: 3130374. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0349. View

14.

Kanwisher N, Yovel G . The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 361(1476):2109-28. PMC: 1857737. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1934. View

15.

Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Palva J, Sams M, Hietanen J, Aronen H, Ilmoniemi R . Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography. Neurosci Lett. 1998; 253(3):147-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00586-2. View

16.

Andrews T, Clarke A, Pell P, Hartley T . Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(1):703-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.046. View

17.

Tsao D, Schweers N, Moeller S, Freiwald W . Patches of face-selective cortex in the macaque frontal lobe. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11(8):877-9. PMC: 8123225. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2158. View

18.

Heisz J, Watter S, Shedden J . Progressive N170 habituation to unattended repeated faces. Vision Res. 2005; 46(1-2):47-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.028. View

19.

van Belle G, De Graef P, Verfaillie K, Busigny T, Rossion B . Whole not hole: expert face recognition requires holistic perception. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48(9):2620-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.034. View

20.

Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M, Schuller A, Lazeyras F, Mayer E . A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 11):2381-95. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg241. View