» Articles » PMID: 22253856

Accommodating Ontologies to Biological Reality--top-level Categories of Cumulative-constitutively Organized Material Entities

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jan 19
PMID 22253856
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is a top-level formal foundational ontology for the biomedical domain. It has been developed with the purpose to serve as an ontologically consistent template for top-level categories of application oriented and domain reference ontologies within the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies Foundry (OBO). BFO is important for enabling OBO ontologies to facilitate in reliably communicating and managing data and metadata within and across biomedical databases. Following its intended single inheritance policy, BFO's three top-level categories of material entity (i.e. 'object', 'fiat object part', 'object aggregate') must be exhaustive and mutually disjoint. We have shown elsewhere that for accommodating all types of constitutively organized material entities, BFO must be extended by additional categories of material entity.

Methodology/principal Findings: Unfortunately, most biomedical material entities are cumulative-constitutively organized. We show that even the extended BFO does not exhaustively cover cumulative-constitutively organized material entities. We provide examples from biology and everyday life that demonstrate the necessity for 'portion of matter' as another material building block. This implies the necessity for further extending BFO by 'portion of matter' as well as three additional categories that possess portions of matter as aggregate components. These extensions are necessary if the basic assumption that all parts that share the same granularity level exhaustively sum to the whole should also apply to cumulative-constitutively organized material entities. By suggesting a notion of granular representation we provide a way to maintain the single inheritance principle when dealing with cumulative-constitutively organized material entities.

Conclusions/significance: We suggest to extend BFO to incorporate additional categories of material entity and to rearrange its top-level material entity taxonomy. With these additions and the notion of granular representation, BFO would exhaustively cover all top-level types of material entities that application oriented ontologies may use as templates, while still maintaining the single inheritance principle.

Citing Articles

Transforming the study of organisms: Phenomic data models and knowledge bases.

Thessen A, Walls R, Vogt L, Singer J, Warren R, Buttigieg P PLoS Comput Biol. 2020; 16(11):e1008376.

PMID: 33232313 PMC: 7685442. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008376.


Levels and building blocks-toward a domain granularity framework for the life sciences.

Vogt L J Biomed Semantics. 2019; 10(1):4.

PMID: 30691505 PMC: 6348634. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-019-0196-2.


CSEO - the Cigarette Smoke Exposure Ontology.

Younesi E, Ansari S, Guendel M, Ahmadi S, Coggins C, Hoeng J J Biomed Semantics. 2014; 5:31.

PMID: 25093069 PMC: 4120729. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-31.


Ontology-Based Querying with Bio2RDF's Linked Open Data.

Callahan A, Cruz-Toledo J, Dumontier M J Biomed Semantics. 2013; 4 Suppl 1:S1.

PMID: 23735196 PMC: 3632999. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-S1-S1.


Fiat or bona fide boundary--a matter of granular perspective.

Vogt L, Grobe P, Quast B, Bartolomaeus T PLoS One. 2012; 7(12):e48603.

PMID: 23251333 PMC: 3520998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048603.

References
1.
Bard J, Rhee S . Ontologies in biology: design, applications and future challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5(3):213-22. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1295. View

2.
Jagers Op Akkerhuis G . Analysing hierarchy in the organization of biological and physical systems. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008; 83(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00023.x. View

3.
Brinkley J, Suciu D, Detwiler L, Gennari J, Rosse C . A framework for using reference ontologies as a foundation for the semantic web. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007; :96-100. PMC: 1839690. View

4.
Rosse C, Mejino J, Modayur B, JAKOBOVITS R, Hinshaw K, Brinkley J . Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5(1):17-40. PMC: 61273. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050017. View

5.
Mejino Jr J, Agoncillo A, Rickard K, Rosse C . Representing complexity in part-whole relationships within the Foundational Model of Anatomy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2004; :450-4. PMC: 1480337. View