» Articles » PMID: 22247757

Attitudes and Acceptance of Oral and Parenteral HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Potential User Groups: a Multinational Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jan 17
PMID 22247757
Citations 140
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of antiviral medications by HIV negative people to prevent acquisition of HIV or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shown promising results in recent trials. To understand the potential impact of PrEP for HIV prevention, in addition to efficacy data, we need to understand both the acceptability of PrEP among members of potential user groups and the factors likely to determine uptake.

Methods And Findings: Surveys of willingness to use PrEP products were conducted with 1,790 members of potential user groups (FSWs, MSM, IDUs, SDCs and young women) in seven countries: Peru, Ukraine, India, Kenya, Botswana, Uganda and South Africa. Analyses of variance were used to assess levels of acceptance across different user groups and countries. Conjoint analysis was used to examine the attitudes and preferences towards hypothetical and known attributes of PrEP programs and medications. Overall, members of potential user groups were willing to consider taking PrEP (61% reported that they would definitely use PrEP). Current results demonstrate that key user groups in different countries perceived PrEP as giving them new possibilities in their lives and would consider using it as soon as it becomes available. These results were maintained when subjects were reminded of potential side effects, the need to combine condom use with PrEP, and for regular HIV testing. Across populations, route of administration was considered the most important attribute of the presented alternatives.

Conclusions: Despite multiple conceivable barriers, there was a general willingness to adopt PrEP in key populations, which suggests that if efficacious and affordable, it could be a useful tool in HIV prevention. There would be a willingness to experience inconvenience and expense at the levels included in the survey. The results suggest that delivery in a long lasting injection would be a good target in drug development.

Citing Articles

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis programmatic preferences among people who inject drugs: findings from a discrete choice experiment.

Eger W, Bazzi A, Valasek C, Vera C, Harvey-Vera A, Strathdee S Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024; 19(1):81.

PMID: 39533335 PMC: 11555929. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00505-2.


Low knowledge levels and high willingness to use oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among Key Populations in Kampala, Uganda: Implications for targeted educational interventions.

Ssuna B, Armstrong-Hough M, Block Ngaybe M, Kalibbala D, Kalyango J, Kiweewa F Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39399668 PMC: 11469517. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4943952/v1.


Understanding the Acceptability of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for HIV Prevention Among At-Risk Populations and Feasibility Considerations for Product Introduction in India: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.

Mukherjee J, Rawat S, Ul Hadi S, Aggarwal P, Chakrapani V, Rath P JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e47700.

PMID: 38324364 PMC: 10882480. DOI: 10.2196/47700.


Creating allies: qualitative exploration of young women's preferences for PrEP methods and parents' role in PrEP uptake and user support in urban and rural Zambia.

Wong C, Munthali T, Mangunje F, Katoka M, Burke H, Musonda B BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):71.

PMID: 38273282 PMC: 10809647. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-02913-7.


Perceptions and experiences of daily and long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among MSM in India.

Agarwal H, Nunez I, Hill L, Dube K, Knoble A, Pamilerin O PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(1):e0001477.

PMID: 38232067 PMC: 10793913. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001477.


References
1.
Liu A, Kittredge P, Vittinghoff E, Raymond H, Ahrens K, Matheson T . Limited knowledge and use of HIV post- and pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay and bisexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008; 47(2):241-7. View

2.
Ryan M, Scott D, Reeves C, Bate A, van Teijlingen E, Russell E . Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5(5):1-186. DOI: 10.3310/hta5050. View

3.
Roehr B . HIV prevention trial in women is abandoned after drugs show no impact on infection rates. BMJ. 2011; 342:d2613. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d2613. View

4.
Guest G, Shattuck D, Johnson L, Akumatey B, Clarke E, Chen P . Acceptability of PrEP for HIV prevention among women at high risk for HIV. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19(4):791-8. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1576. View

5.
Myers G, Mayer K . Oral preexposure anti-HIV prophylaxis for high-risk U.S. populations: current considerations in light of new findings. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011; 25(2):63-71. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2010.0222. View