» Articles » PMID: 36175860

Socio-behavioral Correlates of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use and Correct Adherence in Men Who Have Sex with Men in West Africa

Abstract

Background: Multiple barriers compromise pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) engagement (i.e., use and adherence) in men who have sex with men (MSM). In low/middle-income countries, little is known about PrEP engagement in this population. In West Africa, the CohMSM-PrEP study was one of the rare interventions providing PrEP to MSM. We estimated PrEP use and correct adherence rates in CohMSM-PrEP, together with associated factors over time.  METHODS: CohMSM-PrEP recruited MSM in four community-based clinics in Mali, Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso, and Togo. Quarterly follow-up included collecting socio-behavioral data, and providing a comprehensive HIV prevention package, PrEP (daily or event-driven), and peer educator (PE)-led counselling. Using repeated measures, multivariate generalized estimating equations models were used to identify factors associated with self-reported i) PrEP use and ii) correct PrEP adherence during participants' most recent anal intercourse (defined as four pills/week for daily users and 2 + 1 + 1 for event-driven users).

Results: Five hundred twenty participants were included with a median follow-up time of 12 months (IQR 6-21). Of the 2839 intercourses declared over the follow-up period, PrEP use was self-reported for 1996 (70%), and correct PrEP adherence for 1461 (73%) of the latter. PrEP use was higher in participants who also attended participating clinics outside of scheduled visits (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95% Confidence Interval, CI], p-value; 1.32[1.01-1.71], 0.040), and in those who practiced condomless anal sex (1.86[1.54-2.24], < 0.001). Correct adherence was higher in those who often contacted PE outside of scheduled visits (2.16[1.01-4.64], 0.047) and in participants who adopted receptive/versatile sexual positions with stable partners (1.36[1.03-1.81], 0.030). Instead, after an interaction effect between financial situation and regimen was tested, it was lower in event-driven users with a difficult/very difficult financial situation (comfortable/just making ends meet & daily, 4.19[2.56-6.86], < 0.001; difficult/very difficult & daily, 6.47[4.05-10.30], < 0.001; comfortable/just making ends meet & event-driven, 1.63[1.22-2.17], 0.001), and in participants who felt alone (0.76[0.58-0.99], 0.042).

Conclusions: Community-based clinic attendance and PE contact outside of scheduled visits were both associated with higher PrEP engagement, but some socially and economically marginalized participants struggled with adherence. As scale-up continues in West Africa, we recommend implementing community-based interventions and providing extra support for vulnerable users to ensure adequate PrEP engagement.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators to uptake and persistence on prep among key populations in Southern Province, Zambia: a thematic analysis.

Stoebenau K, Muchanga G, Ahmad S, Bwalya C, Mwale M, Toussaint S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1617.

PMID: 38886691 PMC: 11184712. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19152-y.


Sexual behaviours and risk with women in MSM in sub-Saharan Africa.

Fiorentino M, Yanwou N, Gravier-Dumonceau Mazelier R, Eubanks A, Roux P, Laurent C AIDS. 2024; 38(3):273-287.

PMID: 38300157 PMC: 10842665. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003787.


Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Hudrudchai S, Suwanwong C, Prasittichok P, Mohan K, Janeaim N J Prev Med Public Health. 2023; 57(1):8-17.

PMID: 38147821 PMC: 10861324. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.23.345.


"We have our reasons": Exploring the acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ghana.

Aidoo-Frimpong G, Abu-Baare G, Apreku A, Amoh-Otu R, Zigah E, Amu-Adu P medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38105990 PMC: 10723517. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299515.


The experience of healthcare workers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Zhang L, Song Y, Zheng X, Liu Y, Chen H Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1224461.

PMID: 37693715 PMC: 10484594. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1224461.


References
1.
Eaton L, Driffin D, Smith H, Conway-Washington C, White D, Cherry C . Psychosocial factors related to willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among Black men who have sex with men attending a community event. Sex Health. 2014; 11(3):244-51. PMC: 4331017. DOI: 10.1071/SH14022. View

2.
Zhang Y, Peng B, She Y, Liang H, Peng H, Qian H . Attitudes toward HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in western China. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013; 27(3):137-41. PMC: 3595955. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2012.0412. View

3.
Ayala G, Makofane K, Santos G, Beck J, Do T, Hebert P . Access to Basic HIV-Related Services and PrEP Acceptability among Men Who Have sex with Men Worldwide: Barriers, Facilitators, and Implications for Combination Prevention. J Sex Transm Dis. 2015; 2013:953123. PMC: 4437423. DOI: 10.1155/2013/953123. View

4.
Holloway I, Dougherty R, Gildner J, Beougher S, Pulsipher C, Montoya J . Brief Report: PrEP Uptake, Adherence, and Discontinuation Among California YMSM Using Geosocial Networking Applications. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016; 74(1):15-20. PMC: 5140696. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001164. View

5.
Thigpen M, Kebaabetswe P, Paxton L, Smith D, Rose C, Segolodi T . Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(5):423-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110711. View