» Articles » PMID: 22232282

First National Survey of Antibiotic Susceptibility of the Bacteroides Fragilis Group: Emerging Resistance to Carbapenems in Argentina

Abstract

The antibiotic susceptibility rates of 363 clinical Bacteroides fragilis group isolates collected from 17 centers in Argentina during the period from 2006 to 2009 were as follows: piperacillin-tazobactam, 99%; ampicillin-sulbactam, 92%; cefoxitin, 72%; tigecycline, 100%; moxifloxacin, 91%; and clindamycin, 52%. No metronidazole resistance was detected in these isolates during this time period. Resistance to imipenem, doripenem, and ertapenem was observed in 1.1%, 1.6%, and 2.3% of B. fragilis group strains, respectively. B. fragilis species showed a resistance profile of 1.5% to imipenem, 1.9% to doripenem, and 2.4% to ertapenem. This is the first report of carbapenem resistance in Argentina. The cfiA gene was present in 8 out of 23 isolates, all of them belonging to the B. fragilis species and displaying reduced susceptibility or resistance to carbapenems (MICs ≥ 4 μg/ml). Three out of eight cfiA-positive isolates were fully resistant to carbapenems, while 5 out of 8 isolates showed low-level resistance (MICs, 4 to 8 μg/ml). The inhibition by EDTA was a good predictor of the presence of metallo-β-lactamases in the fully resistant B. fragilis strains, but discrepant results were observed for low-level resistant isolates. B. fragilis was more susceptible to antimicrobial agents than other Bacteroides species. Bacteroides vulgatus species was the most resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam, and B. thetaiotaomicron/ovatus strains showed the highest level of resistance to carbapenems, with an unknown resistance mechanism. B. vulgatus and the uncommon non-Bacteroides fragilis species were the most resistant to moxifloxacin, showing an overall resistance rate of 15.1%.

Citing Articles

Amidinoquinoxaline -oxides: synthesis and activity against anaerobic bacteria.

Gruber N, Fernandez-Canigia L, Kilimciler N, Stipa P, Bisceglia J, Garcia M RSC Adv. 2023; 13(39):27391-27402.

PMID: 37711381 PMC: 10498151. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra01184d.


Distribution, Trends, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of , , , and Species Causing Bacteremia in Japan During 2011-2020: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on National Surveillance Data.

Kajihara T, Yahara K, Kitamura N, Hirabayashi A, Hosaka Y, Sugai M Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023; 10(7):ofad334.

PMID: 37469615 PMC: 10352651. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad334.


Phenotypic and Genotypic Correlation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis: Lessons Learnt.

Jha L, Lal Y B, Ragupathi N, Veeraraghavan B, Prakash J Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36268.

PMID: 37073211 PMC: 10105825. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36268.


Effectiveness and safety of morinidazole in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease: A multicenter, prospective, open-label phase IV trial.

Zhou T, Yuan M, Cui P, Li J, Jia F, Wang S Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:888186.

PMID: 35991648 PMC: 9382104. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.888186.


Antibiotic Resistance and Mechanisms of Pathogenic Bacteria in Tubo-Ovarian Abscess.

Tang H, Zhou H, Zhang R Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12:958210.

PMID: 35967860 PMC: 9363611. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.958210.


References
1.
Grisold A, Wendelin I, Presterl E, Raggam R, Masoud L, Badura A . In vitro activity of ten antibiotics, including tigecycline, against Bacteroides species in Austria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 26(7):525-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-007-0318-0. View

2.
Snydman D, Jacobus N, McDermott L, Ruthazer R, Golan Y, Goldstein E . National survey on the susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group: report and analysis of trends in the United States from 1997 to 2004. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51(5):1649-55. PMC: 1855532. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01435-06. View

3.
Podglajen I, Breuil J, Collatz E . Insertion of a novel DNA sequence, 1S1186, upstream of the silent carbapenemase gene cfiA, promotes expression of carbapenem resistance in clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis. Mol Microbiol. 1994; 12(1):105-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00999.x. View

4.
Nguyen M, Yu V, Morris A, McDermott L, Wagener M, Harrell L . Antimicrobial resistance and clinical outcome of Bacteroides bacteremia: findings of a multicenter prospective observational trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 30(6):870-6. DOI: 10.1086/313805. View

5.
Liu C, Huang Y, Liao C, Yen L, Lin H, Hsueh P . Increasing trends in antimicrobial resistance among clinically important anaerobes and Bacteroides fragilis isolates causing nosocomial infections: emerging resistance to carbapenems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52(9):3161-8. PMC: 2533455. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00355-08. View