» Articles » PMID: 22231125

Detection of Impaired Glucose Regulation And/or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Using Primary Care Electronic Data, in a Multiethnic UK Community Setting

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2012 Jan 11
PMID 22231125
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a score for detecting the glycaemic categories of impaired glucose regulation (IGR) and type 2 diabetes using the WHO 2011 diagnostic criteria.

Methods: We used data from 6,390 individuals aged 40-75 years from a multiethnic population based screening study. We developed a logistic regression model for predicting IGR and type 2 diabetes (diagnosed using OGTT or HbA(1c) ≥ 6.5% [48 mmol/mol]) from data which are routinely stored in primary care. We developed the score by summing the β coefficients. We externally validated the score using data from 3,225 participants aged 40-75 years screened as part of another study.

Results: The score includes age, ethnicity, sex, family history of diabetes, antihypertensive therapy and BMI. Fifty per cent of a population would need to be invited for testing to detect type 2 diabetes mellitus on OGTT with 80% sensitivity; this is slightly raised to 54% that need to be invited if using HbA(1c). Inviting the top 10% for testing, 9% of these would have type 2 diabetes mellitus using an OGTT (positive predictive value [PPV] 8.9% [95% CI 5.8%,12.8%]), 26% would have IGR (PPV 25.9% [95% CI 20.9%, 31.4%]). Using HbA(1c) increases the PPV to 19% for type 2 diabetes mellitus (PPV 18.6% [95% CI 14.2%, 23.7%]) and 28% for an HbA(1c) between 6.0% and 6.4% (PPV 28.3% [95% CI 23.1%, 34.0%]).

Conclusions: The score can be used to reliably identify those with undiagnosed IGR and type 2 diabetes in multiethnic populations. This is the first score developed taking into account HbA(1c) in the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

Citing Articles

Multiplicative versus additive modelling of causal effects using instrumental variables for survival outcomes - a comparison.

John E, Crowther M, Didelez V, Sheehan N Stat Methods Med Res. 2024; 34(1):3-25.

PMID: 39659143 PMC: 11800712. DOI: 10.1177/09622802241293765.


Long-term ambient air pollution exposure and prospective change in sedentary behaviour and physical activity in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes in the UK.

Goldney J, Henson J, Edwardson C, Khunti K, Davies M, Yates T J Public Health (Oxf). 2023; 46(1):e32-e42.

PMID: 38103023 PMC: 10901272. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad263.


Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Cheng W, Mi Y, Dong W, Tse E, Wong C, Bedford L Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37046512 PMC: 10093270. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13071294.


Identifying Glucose Metabolism Status in Nondiabetic Japanese Adults Using Machine Learning Model with Simple Questionnaire.

Uchida T, Kanamori T, Teramoto T, Nonaka Y, Tanaka H, Nakamura S Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:1026121.

PMID: 36118835 PMC: 9481387. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1026121.


Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Diabetes Screening in Oman.

Al-Lawati N, Alfonso H, Al-Lawati J Oman Med J. 2022; 37(1):e340.

PMID: 35211343 PMC: 8844580. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2021.123.


References
1.
Webb D, Gray L, Khunti K, Srinivasan B, Taub N, Campbell S . Screening for diabetes using an oral glucose tolerance test within a western multi-ethnic population identifies modifiable cardiovascular risk: the ADDITION-Leicester study. Diabetologia. 2011; 54(9):2237-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2189-2. View

2.
. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(7):1327-34. PMC: 2699715. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-9033. View

3.
Gholap N, Davies M, Patel K, Sattar N, Khunti K . Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in South Asians. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010; 5(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2010.08.002. View

4.
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Robson J, Sheikh A, Brindle P . Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QDScore. BMJ. 2009; 338:b880. PMC: 2659857. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b880. View

5.
Chatterjee R, Narayan K, Lipscomb J, Phillips L . Screening adults for pre-diabetes and diabetes may be cost-saving. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(7):1484-90. PMC: 2890345. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0054. View