» Articles » PMID: 22222318

Determinants of Vitamin D Status Among Overweight and Obese Puerto Rican Adults

Overview
Journal Ann Nutr Metab
Publisher Karger
Date 2012 Jan 7
PMID 22222318
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aims: Low vitamin D status is highly prevalent worldwide, and the major determinants are sun exposure and vitamin D intake. We aimed to measure vitamin D status in a sample of overweight/obese adults in Puerto Rico, an area with plenty of sun exposure, and relate it to vitamin D intake, sun exposure and body composition.

Methods: Serum 25(OH)D levels (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), body weight and fat (bioimpedance), vitamin D intake and sun exposure (questionnaires) were assessed. Analysis included age-adjusted correlations and multivariate regression.

Results: In 98 subjects (66% females; 40-65 years), median serum 25(OH)D levels were 30.7 ng/ml (25-75th percentile 25.0-37.3); 55% had levels >30 ng/ml, 31% had levels between 20 and 30 ng/ml and 14% had levels <20 ng/ml. Total vitamin D intake was 180 IU/day (45-615), and the sun exposure score was 22 (17-27). After adjusting for gender, 25(OH)D levels were significantly correlated with vitamin D intake (r = 0.24, p = 0.018), the sum of sun exposure and vitamin D intake indices (r = 0.34, p = 0.001) and percent body fat (r = -0.25, p = 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender and percent body fat, the sum of sun exposure and vitamin D intake indices remained statistically associated with 25(OH)D levels (β = 1.5, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In this group of overweight and obese individuals, 25(OH)D was significantly related to vitamin D intake, sun exposure and vitamin D intake indices and percent body fat.

Citing Articles

Association between serum vitamin D level and cardiovascular disease in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

Zhang N, Wang Y, Li W, Wang Y, Zhang H, Xu D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6454.

PMID: 39987347 PMC: 11846893. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90785-8.


Vitamin D Enhancement of Adipose Biology: Implications on Obesity-Associated Cardiometabolic Diseases.

Lee M Nutrients. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940444 PMC: 11820181. DOI: 10.3390/nu17030586.


The Association of Obesity and the Antiaging Humoral Factor Klotho in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

Orces C ScientificWorldJournal. 2022; 2022:7274858.

PMID: 36061981 PMC: 9433301. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7274858.


Circulating Vitamin D Levels and DNA Repair Capacity in Four Molecular Subtypes of Women with Breast Cancer.

Ortiz-Sanchez C, Encarnacion-Medina J, Vergne R, Padilla L, Matta J Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(18).

PMID: 32961801 PMC: 7555346. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21186880.


The Association between Body Mass Index and Vitamin D Supplement Use among Adults in the United States.

Orces C Cureus. 2019; 11(9):e5721.

PMID: 31720189 PMC: 6823089. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5721.


References
1.
Araujo A, Travison T, Esche G, Holick M, Chen T, McKinlay J . Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone mineral density among Hispanic men. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 20(2):245-55. PMC: 2756973. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0652-9. View

2.
Taylor S, Westerhof W, Im S, Lim J . Noninvasive techniques for the evaluation of skin color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 54(5 Suppl 2):S282-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.12.041. View

3.
Fitzpatrick T . The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988; 124(6):869-71. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. View

4.
Malvy D, Guinot C, Preziosi P, Galan P, CHAPUY M, Maamer M . Relationship between vitamin D status and skin phototype in general adult population. Photochem Photobiol. 2000; 71(4):466-9. DOI: 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)071<0466:rbvdsa>2.0.co;2. View

5.
Compston J, Vedi S, Ledger J, Webb A, Gazet J, Pilkington T . Vitamin D status and bone histomorphometry in gross obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981; 34(11):2359-63. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/34.11.2359. View