» Articles » PMID: 22213036

Genetic Parameter Estimates for Growth Traits and Prolificacy in Raeini Cashmere Goats

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Jan 4
PMID 22213036
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The main objectives of this study were to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters for growth traits and prolificacy in the Raeini Cashmere goat. Traits included, birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT), 6-month weight (6WT), 9-month weight (9WT), 12-month weight (12WT), average daily gain from birth to weaning (ADG1), average daily gain from weaning to 6WT (ADG2), average daily gain from 6WT to 12WT (ADG3), survival rate (SR), litter size at birth (LSB) and litter size at weaning (LSW) and total litter weight at birth (LWB). Data were collected over a period of 28 years (1982-2009) at the experimental breeding station of Raeini goat, southeast of Iran. Genetic parameters were estimated with univariate models using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) procedures. In addition to an animal model, sire and threshold models, using a logit link function, were used for analyses of SR. Age of dam, birth of type, sex and of kidding had significant influence (p < 0.05 or 0.01) all the traits. Direct heritability estimates were low for prolificacy traits (0.04 ± 0.01 for LSB, 0.09 ± 0.02 for LSW, 0.16 ± 0.02 for LWB and 0.05 ± 0.02 for SR) and average daily gain (0.12 ± 0.03 for ADG1, 0.08 ± 0.02 for ADG2, and 0.07 ± 0.03 for ADG3) to moderate for production traits (0.22 ± 0.02 for BWT, 0.25 ± 0.02 for WWT, 0.29 ± 0.04 for 6WT, 0.30 ± 0.02 for 9WT, 0.32 ± 0.05 for 12WT). The estimates for the maternal additive genetic variance ratios were lower than direct heritability for BWT (0.17 ± 0.03) and WWT (0.07 ± 0.02).

Citing Articles

Genetic characterization of cashmere goat () populations in Mongolia.

Baldan S, Solkner J, Gebre K, Meszaros G, Crooijmans R, Periasamy K Front Genet. 2024; 15:1421529.

PMID: 39355687 PMC: 11442248. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1421529.


Genetic analysis of efficiency-related traits in Boer x Central Highland goats.

Tesema Z, Alemayehu K, Getachew T, Kebede D, Tilahun M, Deribe B PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305749.

PMID: 38985721 PMC: 11236190. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305749.


Estimation of crossbreeding and genetic parameters for reproductive traits of Boer x Central Highland goats in Ethiopia.

Tesema Z, Deribe B, Tilahun M, Kefale A, Alebachew G, Alemayehu K PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291996.

PMID: 37756341 PMC: 10529573. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291996.


Genetic evaluation of growth rate and efficiency-related traits in Dorper × local crossbred sheep population.

Besufkad S, Goshme S, Abebe A, Bisrat A, Abebe A, Zewdie T Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023; 55(4):249.

PMID: 37353596 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-023-03669-2.


Estimates of Genetic Parameters for Direct and Maternal Effects on Pre-Weaning Growth Traits in Turkish Saanen Kids.

Erdogan Atac F, Takma C, Gevrekci Y, Ozis Altincekic S, Ayasan T Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 36899797 PMC: 10000082. DOI: 10.3390/ani13050940.


References
1.
Konyali A, Tolu C, Das G, Savas T . Factors affecting placental traits and relationships of placental traits with neonatal behaviour in goat. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006; 97(3-4):394-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.09.008. View

2.
Gunia M, Phocas F, Arquet R, Alexandre G, Mandonnet N . Genetic parameters for body weight, reproduction, and parasite resistance traits in the Creole goat. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89(11):3443-51. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-3872. View

3.
Hatcher S, Atkins K, Safari E . Lamb survival in Australian Merino sheep: a genetic analysis. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88(10):3198-205. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2461. View

4.
Shaat I, Maki-Tanila A . Variation in direct and maternal genetic effects for meat production traits in Egyptian Zaraibi goats. J Anim Breed Genet. 2009; 126(3):198-208. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00784.x. View

5.
Willham R . The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. 3. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. J Anim Sci. 1972; 35(6):1288-93. DOI: 10.2527/jas1972.3561288x. View