» Articles » PMID: 22207880

An Oscillatory Contractile Pole-Force Component Dominates the Traction Forces Exerted by Migrating Amoeboid Cells

Overview
Journal Cell Mol Bioeng
Publisher Springer
Date 2011 Dec 31
PMID 22207880
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used principal component analysis to dissect the mechanics of chemotaxis of amoeboid cells into a reduced set of dominant components of cellular traction forces and shape changes. The dominant traction force component in wild-type cells accounted for ~40% of the mechanical work performed by these cells, and consisted of the cell attaching at front and back contracting the substrate towards its centroid (pole-force). The time evolution of this pole-force component was responsible for the periodic variations of cell length and strain energy that the cells underwent during migration. We identified four additional canonical components, reproducible from cell to cell, overall accounting for an additional ~20% of mechanical work, and associated with events such as lateral protrusion of pseudopodia. We analyzed mutant strains with contractility defects to quantify the role that non-muscle Myosin II (MyoII) plays in amoeboid motility. In MyoII essential light chain null cells the polar-force component remained dominant. On the other hand, MyoII heavy chain null cells exhibited a different dominant traction force component, with a marked increase in lateral contractile forces, suggesting that cortical contractility and/or enhanced lateral adhesions are important for motility in this cell line. By compressing the mechanics of chemotaxing cells into a reduced set of temporally-resolved degrees of freedom, the present study may contribute to refined models of cell migration that incorporate cell-substrate interactions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12195-011-0184-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Citing Articles

Traction force microscopy for understanding cellular mechanotransduction.

Hur S, Jeong J, Ban M, Park J, Yoon J, Hwang Y BMB Rep. 2020; 53(2):74-81.

PMID: 31964473 PMC: 7061206.


Dynamic Tracking of Osteoblastic Cell Traction Force during Guided Migration.

Hui J, Pang S Cell Mol Bioeng. 2019; 11(1):11-23.

PMID: 31719876 PMC: 6816708. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-017-0514-7.


Three-Dimensional Monolayer Stress Microscopy.

Serrano R, Aung A, Yeh Y, Varghese S, Lasheras J, Del Alamo J Biophys J. 2019; 117(1):111-128.

PMID: 31103228 PMC: 6626853. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.03.041.


Two-Layer Elastographic 3-D Traction Force Microscopy.

Alvarez-Gonzalez B, Zhang S, Gomez-Gonzalez M, Meili R, Firtel R, Lasheras J Sci Rep. 2017; 7:39315.

PMID: 28074837 PMC: 5225457. DOI: 10.1038/srep39315.


Cytoskeletal Mechanics Regulating Amoeboid Cell Locomotion.

Alvarez-Gonzalez B, Meili R, Firtel R, Bastounis E, Del Alamo J, Lasheras J Appl Mech Rev. 2014; 66(5).

PMID: 25328163 PMC: 4201387. DOI: 10.1115/1.4026249.


References
1.
Killich T, Plath P, HASS E, Xiang W, Bultmann H, Rensing L . Cell movement and shape are non-random and determined by intracellular, oscillatory rotating waves in Dictyostelium amoebae. Biosystems. 1994; 33(2):75-87. DOI: 10.1016/0303-2647(94)90048-5. View

2.
Harris A, Wild P, Stopak D . Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science. 1980; 208(4440):177-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.6987736. View

3.
Dembo M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K . Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys J. 1996; 70(4):2008-22. PMC: 1225170. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79767-9. View

4.
Li S, Butler P, Wang Y, Hu Y, Han D, Usami S . The role of the dynamics of focal adhesion kinase in the mechanotaxis of endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(6):3546-51. PMC: 122560. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.052018099. View

5.
Chien S . Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 292(3):H1209-24. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01047.2006. View