» Articles » PMID: 22207269

Interdependencies of Aortic Arch Secondary Flow Patterns, Geometry, and Age Analysed by 4-dimensional Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Dec 31
PMID 22207269
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: It was the aim to analyse the impact of age, aortic arch geometry, and size on secondary flow patterns such as helix and vortex flow derived from flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (4D PC-MRI).

Methods: 62 subjects (age range = 20-80 years) without circumscribed pathologies of the thoracic aorta (ascending aortic (AAo) diameter: 3.2 ± 0.6 cm [range 2.2-5.1]) were examined by 4D PC-MRI after IRB-approval and written informed consent. Blood flow visualisation based on streamlines and time-resolved 3D particle traces was performed. Aortic diameter, shape (gothic, crook-shaped, cubic), angle, and age were correlated with existence and extent of secondary flow patterns (helicity, vortices); statistical modelling was performed.

Results: Helical flow was the typical pattern in standard crook-shaped aortic arches. With altered shapes and increasing age, helicity was less common. AAo diameter and age had the highest correlation (r = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively) with number of detected vortices. None of the other arch geometric or demographic variables (for all, P ≥ 0.177) improved statistical modelling.

Conclusion: Substantially different secondary flow patterns can be observed in the normal thoracic aorta. Age and the AAo diameter were the parameters correlating best with presence and amount of vortices. Findings underline the importance of age- and geometry-matched control groups for haemodynamic studies.

Key Points: • Secondary blood flow patterns (helices, vortices) are commonly observed in the aorta • Secondary flow patterns predominantly depend on patient age and aortic diameter • Geometric factors show a lesser impact on blood flow patterns than age and diameter • Future analyses of flow patterns should incorporate age- and diameter dependencies.

Citing Articles

Three-dimensional aortic arch geometry and blood flow in neonates after surgical repair for aortic coarctation.

Fricke K, Christierson L, Heiberg E, Sjoberg P, Hedstrom E, Steiner K Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 11():1518070.

PMID: 39834739 PMC: 11743609. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1518070.


Aortic Root Vortex Formation During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Pangelina C, Vu V, May-Newman K ASAIO J. 2024; 71(2):149-156.

PMID: 39190436 PMC: 11761014. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002298.


Implications of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Stenosis/Insufficiency as Risk Factors for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.

Jabagi H, Levine D, Gharibeh L, Camillo C, Castillero E, Ferrari G Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(6):178.

PMID: 39077527 PMC: 11264121. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2406178.


Current and Future Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Coronary Artery Disease.

Candreva A, De Nisco G, Lodi Rizzini M, DAscenzo F, De Ferrari G, Gallo D Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(11):377.

PMID: 39076179 PMC: 11269074. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2311377.


3D Characterization of the Aortic Valve and Aortic Arch in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients.

Yeats B, Galvez D, Sivakumar S, Holst K, Polsani V, Yadav P Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(8):2258-2268.

PMID: 38734846 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03527-8.


References
1.
Moran P . A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging. 1982; 1(4):197-203. DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(82)90170-9. View

2.
Walker P, Cranney G, Scheidegger M, Waseleski G, Pohost G, Yoganathan A . Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993; 3(3):521-30. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880030315. View

3.
Markl M, Harloff A, Bley T, Zaitsev M, Jung B, Weigang E . Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(4):824-31. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20871. View

4.
Kilner P, Yang G, Mohiaddin R, Firmin D, LONGMORE D . Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation. 1993; 88(5 Pt 1):2235-47. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2235. View

5.
Bogren H, Buonocore M, Valente R . Four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease compared to age-matched normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 19(4):417-27. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20018. View