» Articles » PMID: 22205975

Differences in Genotype and Virulence Among Four Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates Belonging to the PMEN1 Clone

Abstract

We report on the comparative genomics and characterization of the virulence phenotypes of four S. pneumoniae strains that belong to the multidrug resistant clone PMEN1 (Spain(23F) ST81). Strains SV35-T23 and SV36-T3 were recovered in 1996 from the nasopharynx of patients at an AIDS hospice in New York. Strain SV36-T3 expressed capsule type 3 which is unusual for this clone and represents the product of an in vivo capsular switch event. A third PMEN1 isolate - PN4595-T23 - was recovered in 1996 from the nasopharynx of a child attending day care in Portugal, and a fourth strain - ATCC700669 - was originally isolated from a patient with pneumococcal disease in Spain in 1984. We compared the genomes among four PMEN1 strains and 47 previously sequenced pneumococcal isolates for gene possession differences and allelic variations within core genes. In contrast to the 47 strains - representing a variety of clonal types - the four PMEN1 strains grouped closely together, demonstrating high genomic conservation within this lineage relative to the rest of the species. In the four PMEN1 strains allelic and gene possession differences were clustered into 18 genomic regions including the capsule, the blp bacteriocins, erythromycin resistance, the MM1-2008 prophage and multiple cell wall anchored proteins. In spite of their genomic similarity, the high resolution chinchilla model was able to detect variations in virulence properties of the PMEN1 strains highlighting how small genic or allelic variation can lead to significant changes in pathogenicity and making this set of strains ideal for the identification of novel virulence determinants.

Citing Articles

Editorial: Otitis Media Genomics and the Middle Ear Microbiome.

Santos-Cortez R, Ehrlich G, Ryan A Front Genet. 2021; 12:763688.

PMID: 34712274 PMC: 8546293. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.763688.


Beyond the pan-genome: current perspectives on the functional and practical outcomes of the distributed genome hypothesis.

Hammond J, Gordon E, Socarras K, Mell J, Ehrlich G Biochem Soc Trans. 2020; 48(6):2437-2455.

PMID: 33245329 PMC: 7752077. DOI: 10.1042/BST20190713.


Lysogeny in .

Garriss G, Henriques-Normark B Microorganisms. 2020; 8(10).

PMID: 33036379 PMC: 7600539. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8101546.


Deletion of genes involved in the ketogluconate metabolism, Entner-Doudoroff pathway, and glucose dehydrogenase increase local and invasive virulence phenotypes in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Hu F, Krol J, Tsai C, Eutsey R, Hiller L, Sen B PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0209688.

PMID: 30620734 PMC: 6324787. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209688.


Function of BriC peptide in the pneumococcal competence and virulence portfolio.

Aggarwal S, Eutsey R, West-Roberts J, Domenech A, Xu W, Abdullah I PLoS Pathog. 2018; 14(10):e1007328.

PMID: 30308062 PMC: 6181422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007328.


References
1.
Vilhelmsson S, Tomasz A, Kristinsson K . Molecular evolution in a multidrug-resistant lineage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: emergence of strains belonging to the serotype 6B Icelandic clone that lost antibiotic resistance traits. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(4):1375-81. PMC: 86448. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.4.1375-1381.2000. View

2.
Rozen S, Skaletsky H . Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 1999; 132:365-86. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365. View

3.
Ding F, Tang P, Hsu M, Cui P, Hu S, Yu J . Genome evolution driven by host adaptations results in a more virulent and antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 14. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:158. PMC: 2678160. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-158. View

4.
McKessar S, Hakenbeck R . The two-component regulatory system TCS08 is involved in cellobiose metabolism of Streptococcus pneumoniae R6. J Bacteriol. 2006; 189(4):1342-50. PMC: 1797370. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01170-06. View

5.
Ewing B, Green P . Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998; 8(3):186-94. View