» Articles » PMID: 22194873

Living with a Crucial Decision: a Qualitative Study of Parental Narratives Three Years After the Loss of Their Newborn in the NICU

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Dec 24
PMID 22194873
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The importance of involving parents in the end-of-life decision-making-process (EOL DMP) for their child in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is recognised by ethical guidelines in numerous countries. However, studies exploring parents' opinions on the type of involvement report conflicting results. This study sought to explore parents' experience of the EOL DMP for their child in the NICU.

Methods: The study used a retrospective longitudinal design with a qualitative analysis of parental experience 3 years after the death of their child in four NICUs in France. 53 face-to-face interviews and 80 telephone interviews were conducted with 164 individuals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore how parents perceived their role in the decision process, what they valued about physicians' attitudes in this situation and whether their long-term emotional well being varied according to their perceived role in the EOL DMP.

Findings: Qualitative analysis identified four types of perceived role in the DMP: shared, medical, informed parental decision, and no decision. Shared DM was the most appreciated by parents. Medical DM was experienced as positive only when it was associated with communication. Informed parental DM was associated with feelings of anxiousness and abandonment. The physicians' attitudes that were perceived as helpful in the long term were explicit sharing of responsibility, clear expression of staff preferences, and respectful care and language toward the child.

Interpretation: Parents find it valuable to express their opinion in the EOL DMP of their child. Nonetheless, they do need continuous emotional support and an explicit share of the responsibility for the decision. As involvement preferences and associated feelings can vary, parents should be able to decide what role they want to play. However, our study suggests that fully autonomous decisions should be misadvised in these types of tragic choices.

Citing Articles

Development of a parent decision support tool for surgical necrotising enterocolitis: a study protocol.

Verhoeven R, Kooi E, Obermann-Borst S, Geurtzen R, Labrie N, Verhagen A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e087939.

PMID: 39653566 PMC: 11628991. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087939.


Shared responsibility for decision-making in NICU: A scoping review.

Pellikka H, Axelin A, Sankilampi U, Kangasniemi M Nurs Ethics. 2023; 30(3):462-476.

PMID: 36688269 PMC: 10185855. DOI: 10.1177/09697330221134948.


"We Absolutely Had the Impression That It Was Our Decision"-A Qualitative Study with Parents of Critically Ill Infants Who Participated in End-of-Life Decision Making.

Beyer M, Kuehlmeyer K, Mang P, Flemmer A, Fuhrer M, Marckmann G Children (Basel). 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 36670597 PMC: 9856896. DOI: 10.3390/children10010046.


Consultation of parents and healthcare professionals in end-of-life decision-making for neonates and infants: a population-level mortality follow-back physician survey.

Dombrecht L, Cools F, Cohen J, Deliens L, Goossens L, Naulaers G BMC Pediatr. 2022; 22(1):597.

PMID: 36241989 PMC: 9561315. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03653-z.


Conversations About End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology: Do Doctors and Parents Implement Shared Decision-Making?.

Schouten E, Beyer M, Flemmer A, de Vos M, Kuehlmeyer K Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:897014.

PMID: 35676897 PMC: 9168986. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.897014.


References
1.
Dehan M, Gold F, Grassin M, Janaud J, Morisot C, Ropert J . [Ethical dilemmas in the perinatal period: guidelines for end-of-life decisions]. Arch Pediatr. 2001; 8(4):407-19. DOI: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)00225-6. View

2.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. View

3.
Barton L, Hodgman J . The contribution of withholding or withdrawing care to newborn mortality. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(6):1487-91. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0392. View

4.
Harrison H . The principles for family-centered neonatal care. Pediatrics. 1993; 92(5):643-50. View

5.
Caplan G . Loss, stress, and mental health. Community Ment Health J. 1990; 26(1):27-48. DOI: 10.1007/BF00752675. View