» Articles » PMID: 36670597

"We Absolutely Had the Impression That It Was Our Decision"-A Qualitative Study with Parents of Critically Ill Infants Who Participated in End-of-Life Decision Making

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36670597
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend shared decision making (SDM) between neonatologists and parents when a decision has to be made about the continuation of life-sustaining treatment (LST). In a previous study, we found that neonatologists and parents at a German Level-III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit performed SDM to a variable but overall small extent. However, we do not know whether parents in Germany prefer an extent of more or sharing.

Methods: We performed a qualitative interview study with parents who participated in our first study. We analyzed the semi-structured interviews with qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.

Results: The participation in medical decision making (MDM) varied across cases. Overall, neonatologists and parents conducted SDM in most cases only to a small extent. All parents appreciated their experience independent of how much they were involved in MDM. The parents who experienced a small extent of sharing were glad that they were protected by neonatologists from having to decide, shielding them from a conflict of interest. The parents who experienced a large extent of sharing especially valued that they were able to fulfil their parental duties even if that meant partaking in a decision to forgo LST.

Discussion: Other studies have also found a variety of possibilities for parents to partake in end-of-life decision making (EOL-DM). Our results suggest that parents do not have a uniform preference for one specific decision-making approach, but rather different parents appreciate their individual experience regardless of the model for DM.

Conclusion: SDM is apparently not a one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, neonatologists and parents have to adapt the decision-making process to the parents' individual needs and preferences for autonomy and protection. Therefore, SDM should not be prescribed as a uniform standard in medico-ethical guidelines, but rather as a flexible guidance for DM for critically ill patients in neonatology.

References
1.
Kaplan M . SPIKES: a framework for breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010; 14(4):514-6. DOI: 10.1188/10.CJON.514-516. View

2.
Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper E . Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ. 2012; 345:e7976. PMC: 3514472. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7976. View

3.
Lau C, Ambalavanan N, Chakraborty H, Wingate M, Carlo W . Extremely low birth weight and infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(5):855-60. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2471. View

4.
Paris J, Graham N, Schreiber M, Goodwin M . Approaches to end-of-life decision-making in the NICU: insights from Dostoevsky's The Grand Inquisitor. J Perinatol. 2006; 26(7):389-91. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211535. View

5.
Geurtzen R, van Heijst A, Draaisma J, Ouwerkerk L, Scheepers H, Hogeveen M . Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 102(8):1541-1549. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.016. View