» Articles » PMID: 22186840

Stent-assisted Coiling of Wide-necked Aneurysms in the Setting of Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Experience in 65 Patients

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2011 Dec 22
PMID 22186840
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Stent-assisted coiling in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage remains controversial. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the utility of this procedure and the risks of hemorrhagic and ischemic complications.

Objective: To assess the utility of stent-assisted coil embolization and pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in the management of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms.

Methods: A retrospective study of 65 patients with ruptured wide-necked aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling. Patients with hydrocephalus or a Hunt and Hess grade ≥ III received a ventriculostomy before endovascular intervention. Patients were treated intraoperatively with 600 mg of clopidogrel and maintained on daily doses of 75 mg of clopidogrel and 81 mg of aspirin. The Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score was recorded at the time of discharge. We identified major bleeding complications secondary to antiplatelet therapy and cases of in-stent thrombosis that required periprocedural thrombolysis.

Results: Of the aneurysms, 66.2% arose within the anterior circulation; 69.2% of patients presented with hydrocephalus or a Hunt and Hess grade ≥ III and required a ventriculostomy. A good outcome (GOS of 4 or 5) was achieved in 63.1% of patients, and the overall mortality rate was 16.9%. There were 10 (15.38%) major complications associated with bleeding secondary to antiplatelet therapy (5 patients, 7.7%) or intraoperative in-stent thrombosis (5 patients, 7.7%). Three (4.6%) patients had a fatal hemorrhage.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that stent-assisted coiling and routine treatment with antiplatelet agents is a viable option in the management of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms.

Citing Articles

A preliminary study of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction with cardiac option for evaluation of endovascular-treated intracranial aneurysms.

Otgonbaatar C, Kim H, Jeon P, Jeon S, Cha S, Ryu J Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1160):1492-1500.

PMID: 38917414 PMC: 11256923. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae117.


Stent-Assisted Embolization for Acutely Ruptured Aneurysm.

Ezura M, Sakata H, Ishida T, Inoue T, Uenohara H J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023; 16(2):74-81.

PMID: 37502640 PMC: 10370971. DOI: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2021-0010.


Endovascular treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: one or multiple sessions?.

Zhang G, Zhang W, Chang H, Shen Y, Ma C, Mao L Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1196725.

PMID: 37426436 PMC: 10325825. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1196725.


Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization Versus Coil Embolization Alone for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms with Mild Symptoms: A Single-Clinic Experience.

Lim G, Shin S, Lee T, Kwon W, Park B, Kwon S J Korean Soc Radiol. 2022; 83(4):887-897.

PMID: 36238920 PMC: 9514579. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0080.


The Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diversion versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis of Real-world Cohort Studies from the Past 10 Years.

Li S, Zeng C, Tao W, Huang Z, Yan L, Tian X AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022; 43(7):1004-1011.

PMID: 35710123 PMC: 9262058. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7539.