» Articles » PMID: 22163274

Improving the Alignment Quality of Consistency Based Aligners with an Evaluation Function Using Synonymous Protein Words

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Dec 14
PMID 22163274
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most sequence alignment tools can successfully align protein sequences with higher levels of sequence identity. The accuracy of corresponding structure alignment, however, decreases rapidly when considering distantly related sequences (<20% identity). In this range of identity, alignments optimized so as to maximize sequence similarity are often inaccurate from a structural point of view. Over the last two decades, most multiple protein aligners have been optimized for their capacity to reproduce structure-based alignments while using sequence information. Methods currently available differ essentially in the similarity measurement between aligned residues using substitution matrices, Fourier transform, sophisticated profile-profile functions, or consistency-based approaches, more recently.In this paper, we present a flexible similarity measure for residue pairs to improve the quality of protein sequence alignment. Our approach, called SymAlign, relies on the identification of conserved words found across a sizeable fraction of the considered dataset, and supported by evolutionary analysis. These words are then used to define a position specific substitution matrix that better reflects the biological significance of local similarity. The experiment results show that the SymAlign scoring scheme can be incorporated within T-Coffee to improve sequence alignment accuracy. We also demonstrate that SymAlign is less sensitive to the presence of structurally non-similar proteins. In the analysis of the relationship between sequence identity and structure similarity, SymAlign can better differentiate structurally similar proteins from non- similar proteins. We show that protein sequence alignments can be significantly improved using a similarity estimation based on weighted n-grams. In our analysis of the alignments thus produced, sequence conservation becomes a better indicator of structural similarity. SymAlign also provides alignment visualization that can display sub-optimal alignments on dot-matrices. The visualization makes it easy to identify well-supported alternative alignments that may not have been identified by dynamic programming. SymAlign is available at http://bio-cluster.iis.sinica.edu.tw/SymAlign/.

Citing Articles

Identifying functionally informative evolutionary sequence profiles.

Gil N, Fiser A Bioinformatics. 2017; 34(8):1278-1286.

PMID: 29211823 PMC: 5905606. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx779.


On the necessity of dissecting sequence similarity scores into segment-specific contributions for inferring protein homology, function prediction and annotation.

Wong W, Maurer-Stroh S, Eisenhaber B, Eisenhaber F BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15:166.

PMID: 24890864 PMC: 4061105. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-166.

References
1.
LARKIN M, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan P, McWilliam H . Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(21):2947-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. View

2.
Bennett-Lovsey R, Herbert A, Sternberg M, Kelley L . Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre. Proteins. 2007; 70(3):611-25. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21688. View

3.
Kemena C, Notredame C . Upcoming challenges for multiple sequence alignment methods in the high-throughput era. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(19):2455-65. PMC: 2752613. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp452. View

4.
Armougom F, Moretti S, Keduas V, Notredame C . The iRMSD: a local measure of sequence alignment accuracy using structural information. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(14):e35-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl218. View

5.
Edgar R . Optimizing substitution matrix choice and gap parameters for sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10:396. PMC: 2791778. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-396. View