Differentially Expressed Profiles in the Larval Testes of Wolbachia Infected and Uninfected Drosophila

Overview

Journal BMC Genomics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Genetics

Date 2011 Dec 8

PMID 22145623

Citations 27

Authors

Ya Zheng

Jia-Lin Wang

Chen Liu

Cui-Ping Wang

Thomas Walker

Yu-Feng Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Wolbachia are endosymbiotic bacteria that are frequently found in arthropods and nematodes. These maternally inherited bacteria manipulate host reproduction by several mechanisms including cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). CI is the most common phenotype induced by Wolbachia and results in the developmental arrest of embryos derived from crosses between Wolbachia-infected males and uninfected females. Although the molecular mechanisms of CI are currently unknown, several studies suggest that host sperm is modified by Wolbachia during spermatogenesis.

Results: We compared the gene expression of Drosophila melanogaster larval testes with and without the wMel strain of Wolbachia to identify candidate genes that could be involved in the interaction between Wolbachia and the insect host. Microarray, quantitative RT-PCR and in situ hybridization analyses were carried out on D. melanogaster larval testes to determine the effect of Wolbachia infection on host gene expression. A total of 296 genes were identified by microarray analysis to have at least a 1.5 fold change [q-value < 5%] in expression. When comparing Wolbachia-infected flies to uninfected flies, 167 genes were up-regulated and 129 genes down-regulated. Differential expression of genes related to metabolism, immunity, reproduction and other functions were observed. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed 12 genes are differentially expressed in the testes of the 3rd instar larvae of Wolbachia-infected and uninfected flies. In situ hybridization demonstrated that Wolbachia infection changes the expression of several genes putatively associated with spermatogenesis including JH induced protein-26 and Mst84Db, or involved in immune (kenny) or metabolism (CG4988-RA).

Conclusions: Wolbachia change the gene expression of 296 genes in the larval testes of D. melanogaster including genes related to metabolism, immunity and reproduction. Interestingly, most of the genes putatively involved in immunity were up-regulated in the presence of Wolbachia. In contrast, most of the genes putatively associated with reproduction (especially spermatogenesis) were down-regulated in the presence of Wolbachia. These results suggest Wolbachia may activate the immune pathway but inhibit spermatogenesis. Our data provide a significant panel of candidate genes that may be involved in the interaction between Wolbachia and their insect hosts. This forms a basis to help elucidate the underlying mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI in Drosophila and the influence of Wolbachia on spermatogenesis.

Citing Articles

Exposure to Pseudomonas spp. increases Anopheles gambiae insecticide resistance in a host-dependent manner.

Silva L, Acerbi G, Amann M, Koella J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29789.

PMID: 39616220 PMC: 11608348. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78288-4.

Microbial biomarkers as indicators of sperm viability in an insect.

McNamara K, Dungan A, Blackall L, Simmons L R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(9):240734.

PMID: 39309259 PMC: 11416813. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240734.

A comprehensive review of -mediated mechanisms to control dengue virus transmission in through innate immune pathways.

Mushtaq I, Sarwar M, Munzoor I Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1434003.

PMID: 39176079 PMC: 11338905. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1434003.

Colonization Resistance of Symbionts in Their Insect Hosts.

Wang Z, Yong H, Zhang S, Liu Z, Zhao Y Insects. 2023; 14(7).

PMID: 37504600 PMC: 10380809. DOI: 10.3390/insects14070594.

Ovarian transcriptional response to Wolbachia infection in D. melanogaster in the context of between-genotype variation in gene expression.

Frantz S, Small C, Cresko W, Singh N G3 (Bethesda). 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 36857313 PMC: 10151400. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad047.

References

Reynolds K, Hoffmann A . Male age, host effects and the weak expression or non-expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila strains infected by maternally transmitted Wolbachia. Genet Res. 2003; 80(2):79-87. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672302005827. View

Kremer N, Dedeine F, Charif D, Finet C, Allemand R, Vavre F . Do variable compensatory mechanisms explain the polymorphism of the dependence phenotype in the Asobara tabida-wolbachia association?. Evolution. 2010; 64(10):2969-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01034.x. View

Tram U, Fredrick K, Werren J, Sullivan W . Paternal chromosome segregation during the first mitotic division determines Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility phenotype. J Cell Sci. 2006; 119(Pt 17):3655-63. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.03095. View

Brennan L, Keddie B, Braig H, Harris H . The endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis induces the expression of host antioxidant proteins in an Aedes albopictus cell line. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2083. PMC: 2324199. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002083. View

Bass B, Cullen K, McCall K . The axon guidance gene lola is required for programmed cell death in the Drosophila ovary. Dev Biol. 2007; 304(2):771-85. PMC: 1905497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.029. View

Soltani-Bejnood M, Thomas S, Villeneuve L, Schwartz K, Hong C, McKee B . Role of the mod(mdg4) common region in homolog segregation in Drosophila male meiosis. Genetics. 2007; 176(1):161-80. PMC: 1893044. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.063289. View

Poinsot D, Charlat S, Mercot H . On the mechanism of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility: confronting the models with the facts. Bioessays. 2003; 25(3):259-65. DOI: 10.1002/bies.10234. View

Tram U, Sullivan W . Role of delayed nuclear envelope breakdown and mitosis in Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Science. 2002; 296(5570):1124-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1070536. View

Evans O, Caragata E, McMeniman C, Woolfit M, Green D, Williams C . Increased locomotor activity and metabolism of Aedes aegypti infected with a life-shortening strain of Wolbachia pipientis. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 10):1436-41. PMC: 2675962. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.028951. View

10.

Kambris Z, Cook P, Phuc H, Sinkins S . Immune activation by life-shortening Wolbachia and reduced filarial competence in mosquitoes. Science. 2009; 326(5949):134-6. PMC: 2867033. DOI: 10.1126/science.1177531. View

11.

Thomas P, Kenny N, Eyles D, Moreira L, ONeill S, Asgari S . Infection with the wMel and wMelPop strains of Wolbachia leads to higher levels of melanization in the hemolymph of Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and Aedes aegypti. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010; 35(3):360-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.11.007. View

12.

Droge W . Oxidative stress and aging. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004; 543:191-200. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8997-0_14. View

13.

Riparbelli M, Giordano R, Callaini G . Effects of Wolbachia on sperm maturation and architecture in Drosophila simulans Riverside. Mech Dev. 2007; 124(9-10):699-714. DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2007.07.001. View

14.

Dubrovsky E, Dubrovskaya V, Bilderback A, Berger E . The isolation of two juvenile hormone-inducible genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 2000; 224(2):486-95. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9800. View

15.

Gruntenko N, Karpova E, Adonyeva N, Chentsova N, Faddeeva N, Alekseev A . Juvenile hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone and dopamine interaction in Drosophila virilis reproduction under normal and nutritional stress conditions. J Insect Physiol. 2005; 51(4):417-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.01.007. View

16.

Wasbrough E, Dorus S, Hester S, Howard-Murkin J, Lilley K, Wilkin E . The Drosophila melanogaster sperm proteome-II (DmSP-II). J Proteomics. 2010; 73(11):2171-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.09.002. View

17.

Zheng Y, Ren P, Wang J, Wang Y . Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility is associated with decreased Hira expression in male Drosophila. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e19512. PMC: 3084885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019512. View

18.

Callaini G, Dallai R, Riparbelli M . Wolbachia-induced delay of paternal chromatin condensation does not prevent maternal chromosomes from entering anaphase in incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans. J Cell Sci. 1997; 110 ( Pt 2):271-80. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.110.2.271. View

19.

Bossan B, Koehncke A, Hammerstein P . A new model and method for understanding Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e19757. PMC: 3091874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019757. View

20.

Cook P, McGraw E . Wolbachia pipientis: an expanding bag of tricks to explore for disease control. Trends Parasitol. 2010; 26(8):373-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2010.05.006. View