The Effect of the Endosymbiont Wolbachia on the Behavior of Insect Hosts

Overview

Journal Insect Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2019 Oct 22

PMID 31631529

Citations 22

Authors

Jie Bi

Yu-Feng Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

As one of the most successful intracellular symbiotic bacteria, Wolbachia can infect many arthropods and nematodes. Wolbachia infection usually affects the reproduction of their hosts to promote their own proliferation and transmission. Currently, most of the studies focus on the mechanisms of Wolbachia interactions with host reproduction. However, in addition to distribution in the reproductive tissues, Wolbachia also infect various somatic tissues of their hosts, including the brain. This raises the potential that Wolbachia may influence some somatic processes, such as behaviors in their hosts. So far, information about the effects of Wolbachia infection on host behavior is still very limited. The present review presents the current literature on different aspects of the influence of Wolbachia on various behaviors, including sleep, learning and memory, mating, feeding and aggression in their insect hosts. We then highlight ongoing scientific efforts in the field that need addressing to advance this field, which can have significant implications for further developing Wolbachia as environmentally friendly biocontrol agents to control insect-borne diseases and agricultural pests.

Citing Articles

Comparison on the quality of sterile Aedes aegypti mosquitoes produced by either radiation-based sterile insect technique or Wolbachia-induced incompatible insect technique.

Kittayapong P, Ninphanomchai S, Thayanukul P, Yongyai J, Limohpasmanee W PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314683.

PMID: 39937795 PMC: 11819552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314683.

Microbiota-neuroepithelial signalling across the gut-brain axis.

Ohara T, Hsiao E Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39743581 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-024-01136-9.

An insect virus differentially alters gene expression among life stages of an insect vector and enhances bacterial phytopathogen transmission.

Lin C, Robledo Buritica J, Sarkar P, Jassar O, Rocha S, Batuman O J Virol. 2024; 99(1):e0163024.

PMID: 39714167 PMC: 11784072. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01630-24.

Mating receptivity mediated by endosymbiont interactions in a haplodiploid thrips species.

Tourani A, Katlav A, Cook J, Riegler M Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2033):20241564.

PMID: 39471850 PMC: 11521595. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1564.

Wolbachia-based emerging strategies for control of vector-transmitted disease.

Montenegro D, Cortes-Cortes G, Balbuena-Alonso M, Warner C, Camps M Acta Trop. 2024; 260:107410.

PMID: 39349234 PMC: 11637914. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107410.

References

Fleury F, Vavre F, Ris N, Fouillet P, Bouletreau M . Physiological cost induced by the maternally-transmitted endosymbiont Wolbachia in the Drosophila parasitoid Leptopilina heterotoma. Parasitology. 2000; 121 Pt 5:493-500. DOI: 10.1017/s0031182099006599. View

Wu C, Zong Q, Du A, Zhang W, Yao H, Yu X . Knockdown of Dynamitin in testes significantly decreased male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 2016; 420(1):79-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.10.007. View

Casper-Lindley C, Kimura S, Saxton D, Essaw Y, Simpson I, Tan V . Rapid fluorescence-based screening for Wolbachia endosymbionts in Drosophila germ line and somatic tissues. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(14):4788-94. PMC: 3147364. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00215-11. View

Albertson R, Casper-Lindley C, Cao J, Tram U, Sullivan W . Symmetric and asymmetric mitotic segregation patterns influence Wolbachia distribution in host somatic tissue. J Cell Sci. 2009; 122(Pt 24):4570-83. PMC: 2787466. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.054981. View

Min K, Benzer S . Wolbachia, normally a symbiont of Drosophila, can be virulent, causing degeneration and early death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(20):10792-6. PMC: 23488. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10792. View

Denis B, Claisse G, Le Rouzic A, Wicker-Thomas C, Lepennetier G, Joly D . Male accessory gland proteins affect differentially female sexual receptivity and remating in closely related Drosophila species. J Insect Physiol. 2017; 99:67-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.03.008. View

Shropshire J, On J, Layton E, Zhou H, Bordenstein S . One prophage WO gene rescues cytoplasmic incompatibility in . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(19):4987-4991. PMC: 5948995. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800650115. View

Smith D, Clarke N, Boone J, Fricke C, Chapman T . Sexual conflict over remating interval is modulated by the pathway. Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1850). PMC: 5360916. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2394. View

Bi J, Zheng Y, Wang R, Ai H, Haynes P, Brownlie J . Wolbachia infection may improve learning and memory capacity of Drosophila by altering host gene expression through microRNA. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2018; 106:47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.11.007. View

10.

Vale P, Jardine M . Sex-specific behavioural symptoms of viral gut infection and Wolbachia in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol. 2015; 82:28-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.08.005. View

11.

Turelli M, Cooper B, Richardson K, Ginsberg P, Peckenpaugh B, Antelope C . Rapid Global Spread of wRi-like Wolbachia across Multiple Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2018; 28(6):963-971.e8. PMC: 5882237. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.015. View

12.

Bonneau M, Landmann F, Labbe P, Justy F, Weill M, Sicard M . The cellular phenotype of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens in the light of cidB diversity. PLoS Pathog. 2018; 14(10):e1007364. PMC: 6201942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007364. View

13.

Pietri J, DeBruhl H, Sullivan W . The rich somatic life of Wolbachia. Microbiologyopen. 2016; 5(6):923-936. PMC: 5221451. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.390. View

14.

Kishani Farahani H, Ashouri A, Goldansaz S, Shapiro M, Pierre J, van Baaren J . Decrease of memory retention in a parasitic wasp: an effect of host manipulation by Wolbachia?. Insect Sci. 2016; 24(4):569-583. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12348. View

15.

Shaw P, Cirelli C, Greenspan R, Tononi G . Correlates of sleep and waking in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000; 287(5459):1834-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1834. View

16.

Dijk D, Czeisler C . Contribution of the circadian pacemaker and the sleep homeostat to sleep propensity, sleep structure, electroencephalographic slow waves, and sleep spindle activity in humans. J Neurosci. 1995; 15(5 Pt 1):3526-38. PMC: 6578184. View

17.

Huber R, Hill S, Holladay C, Biesiadecki M, Tononi G, Cirelli C . Sleep homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster. Sleep. 2004; 27(4):628-39. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/27.4.628. View

18.

LePage D, Metcalf J, Bordenstein S, On J, Perlmutter J, Shropshire J . Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature. 2017; 543(7644):243-247. PMC: 5358093. DOI: 10.1038/nature21391. View

19.

Zheng Y, Ren P, Wang J, Wang Y . Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility is associated with decreased Hira expression in male Drosophila. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e19512. PMC: 3084885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019512. View

20.

Zug R, Hammerstein P . Still a host of hosts for Wolbachia: analysis of recent data suggests that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are infected. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38544. PMC: 3369835. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038544. View