» Articles » PMID: 8111809

Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes: a Planning Model for Pharmacoeconomic Research

Overview
Journal Clin Ther
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1993 Nov 1
PMID 8111809
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Medical, ethical, and societal concerns about costs, access, and quality of care are causing health care practitioners to consider a more comprehensive model for medical decision making. Consequently, interest in research to assess the outcomes of health care has been increasing. The purpose of this paper is to explicate a theoretical framework for identifying, collecting, and using outcomes data to assess the value of pharmaceutical treatment alternatives. Causal relationships between disease, health outcomes, and decisions about medical care interventions (eg, treatment with pharmaceutical products and services) are proposed to address limitations inherent in the traditional medical decision-making model. The Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) model depicts the value of a pharmaceutical product or service as a combination of traditional clinical-based outcomes with more contemporary measures of economic efficiency and quality. This integrated approach provides a theoretical basis for considering potential trade-offs among economic, clinical, and humanistic variables in optimizing the allocation of health care resources. The ECHO model is a preliminary step to modeling outcomes from pharmaceutical treatments and services. Data collection instruments need to be developed, and the proposed relationships among outcomes variables should be established empirically. The ECHO model should assist health services researchers in planning, conducting, and evaluating pharmaceutical products and services from a multidimensional perspective.

Citing Articles

Beliefs of patients who visited community pharmacies about medicines and supplements, the need for drug therapy and medication adherence - a cross-sectional study.

Manoliu-Hamwi E, Dascalu C, Ghiciuc C, Zegan G, Carausu E, Moscu M J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025; 17(1):2438235.

PMID: 39931507 PMC: 11809176. DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2438235.


The role of hospital pharmacists in supporting the appropriate and safe use of CGT/ATMPs: a scoping review of current insights.

Shi J, Chen X, Hu H, Ung C BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):52.

PMID: 39789612 PMC: 11721208. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12026-4.


Digital Serious Games to Promote Behavior Change in Children With Chronic Diseases: Scoping Review and Development of a Self-Management Learning Framework.

Sarasmita M, Lee Y, Chan F, Chen H J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49692.

PMID: 39158952 PMC: 11369548. DOI: 10.2196/49692.


Assessment of satisfaction of attendees of healthcare centers in Jordan with community pharmacy services of pharmacies they usually use.

Al-Taani G, Ayoub N PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305991.

PMID: 39038057 PMC: 11262638. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305991.


Clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital inpatient setting: a systematic review.

Magedanz L, Silva H, Galato D, Fernandez-Llimos F Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(3):602-613.

PMID: 38570475 PMC: 11133179. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01717-x.