"Knowing is Better": Preferences of Diverse Older Adults for Discussing Prognosis

Overview

Journal J Gen Intern Med

Publisher Springer

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2011 Dec 1

PMID 22127798

Citations 51

Authors

Cyrus Ahalt

Louise C Walter

Lindsey Yourman

Catherine Eng

Eliseo J Perez-Stable

Alexander K Smith

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Prognosis is critical in individualizing care for older adults with late life disability. Evidence suggests that preferences for prognostic information may be culturally determined. Yet little is known about the preferences of diverse elders for discussing prognosis.

Objective: To determine the preferences for discussing prognosis of a diverse sample of older adults with late-life disability.

Design & Participants: We interviewed 60 older adults with mean age 78 and mean 2.5 Activities of Daily Living dependencies. Participants were recruited from San Francisco's On Lok program, the first Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). Participants were interviewed in English, Spanish, and Cantonese, and responded to scenarios in which their doctors estimated they had 5 years and 1 year left to live. Open-ended questions explored the reasons for their responses. Results were analyzed qualitatively using grounded theory.

Key Results: Sixty-five percent of participants wanted to discuss the prognosis if their doctor estimated they had <5 years to live and 75% if the estimate was <1 year. Three themes were prominent among patients who wanted to discuss prognosis: to prepare, to make the most of the life they had left, and to make medical or health-related decisions. Those who preferred not to discuss prognosis described emotional difficulty, the uncertainty of prognosis, or that it would not be useful. Nearly all participants said that doctors should not make assumptions based on race or ethnicity, though differences between ethnic groups emerged.

Conclusions: Most patients in this diverse sample of disabled elders were interested in discussing prognosis, while a substantial minority was not. Among those participants who preferred to discuss prognosis, many said that prognostic information would be important as they made difficult medical and personal decisions in late-life. Clinicians should inquire about preferences for discussing prognosis before sharing prognostic estimates.

Citing Articles

Long term survival in elderly patients with resectable upper tract urothelial carcinoma: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.

Suzuki S, Nagumo Y, Kojo K, Kandori S, Sakurai H, Takahashi R BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):464.

PMID: 40082801 PMC: 11907843. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13852-3.

Interventions that challenge established and accepted clinical practice: lessons learnt from a process evaluation of the STOP-APE trial.

Ignatowicz A, Greenfield S, Gaddu P, Prince C, Toshner M, Robinson G Health Technol Assess. 2025; :1-11.

PMID: 40013982 PMC: 11891625. DOI: 10.3310/PSDG7298.

External Validation of the Walter Index for Posthospitalization Mortality Prediction in Older Adults.

Avelino-Silva T, Lee S, Covinsky K, Walter L, Deardorff W, Boscardin J JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(1):e2455475.

PMID: 39841475 PMC: 11755200. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55475.

Prognostic communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: findings from a Nationwide Italian survey.

Moglia C, Palumbo F, Botto R, Iazzolino B, Ticozzi N, Calvo A Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(12):5787-5794.

PMID: 39073531 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6.

Exploring perceptions of online calculators for identifying community-dwelling older people at risk of dying: A qualitative study.

Bennett C, Beach S, Pacheco K, Hsu A, Tanuseputro P, Manuel D PEC Innov. 2024; 5:100313.

PMID: 39040661 PMC: 11260570. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100313.

References

Fried T, Bradley E, OLeary J . Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51(10):1398-403. DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51457.x. View

Morrison R, Meier D . High rates of advance care planning in New York City's elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(22):2421-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.22.2421. View

Huang X, Butow P, Meiser B, Goldstein D . Attitudes and information needs of Chinese migrant cancer patients and their relatives. Aust N Z J Med. 1999; 29(2):207-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1999.tb00685.x. View

Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J . Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84(1):48-51. PMC: 2363610. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573. View

. Breast cancer screening in older women. American Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Committee. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(7):842-4. View

Kelley A, Wenger N, Sarkisian C . Opiniones: end-of-life care preferences and planning of older Latinos. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58(6):1109-16. PMC: 2924957. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02853.x. View

Fried T, Tinetti M, Towle V, OLeary J, Iannone L . Effects of benefits and harms on older persons' willingness to take medication for primary cardiovascular prevention. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(10):923-8. PMC: 3101287. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.32. View

Sandelowski M . Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995; 18(2):179-83. DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770180211. View

Blackhall L, Murphy S, FRANK G, Michel V, Azen S . Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995; 274(10):820-5. View

10.

Butow P, MacLean M, Dunn S, Tattersall M, Boyer M . The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol. 1997; 8(9):857-63. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008284006045. View

11.

Walter L, Covinsky K . Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001; 285(21):2750-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.21.2750. View

12.

Kaplowitz S, Campo S, Chiu W . Cancer patients' desires for communication of prognosis information. Health Commun. 2002; 14(2):221-41. DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1402_4. View

13.

Clayton J, Butow P, Tattersall M . When and how to initiate discussion about prognosis and end-of-life issues with terminally ill patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 30(2):132-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.02.014. View

14.

Covinsky K, Justice A, Rosenthal G, Palmer R, Landefeld C . Measuring prognosis and case mix in hospitalized elders. The importance of functional status. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12(4):203-8. PMC: 1497092. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.012004203.x. View

15.

Berg A . Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs. 2002; 102(9):107-17. View

16.

Fried L, Kronmal R, Newman A, Bild D, Mittelmark M, Polak J . Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA. 1998; 279(8):585-92. DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.8.585. View

17.

Lamont E, Christakis N . Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134(12):1096-105. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-12-200106190-00009. View

18.

Curtis J, Patrick D, Caldwell E, Collier A . Why don't patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care? Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160(11):1690-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1690. View

19.

Holmes H, Cox Hayley D, Alexander G, Sachs G . Reconsidering medication appropriateness for patients late in life. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(6):605-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.6.605. View

20.

C Carey E, Covinsky K, Lui L, Eng C, Sands L, Walter L . Prediction of mortality in community-living frail elderly people with long-term care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 56(1):68-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01496.x. View