» Articles » PMID: 22127229

Approaches for Quantifying Energy Intake and %calorie Restriction During Calorie Restriction Interventions in Humans: the Multicenter CALERIE Study

Abstract

Calorie restriction (CR) is a component of most weight loss interventions and a potential strategy to slow aging. Accurate determination of energy intake and %CR is critical when interpreting the results of CR interventions; this is most accurately achieved using the doubly labeled water method to quantify total energy expenditure (TEE). However, the costs and analytical requirements of this method preclude its repeated use in many clinical trials. Our aims were to determine 1) the optimal TEE assessment time points for quantifying average energy intake and %CR during long-term CR interventions and 2) the optimal approach for quantifying short-term changes in body energy stores to determine energy intake and %CR during 2-wk DLW periods. Adults randomized to a CR intervention in the multicenter CALERIE study underwent measurements of TEE by doubly labeled water and body composition at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6. Average %CR achieved during the intervention was 24.9 ± 8.7%, which was computed using an approach that included four TEE assessment time points (i.e., TEE(baseline, months 1, 3, and 6)) plus the 6-mo change in body composition. Approaches that included fewer TEE assessments yielded %CR values of 23.4 ± 9.0 (TEE(baseline,) months 3 and 6), 25.0 ± 8.7 (TEE(baseline,) months 1 and 6), and 20.9 ± 7.1% (TEE(baseline, month 6)); the latter approach differed significantly from approach 1 (P < 0.001). TEE declined 9.6 ± 9.9% within 2-4 wk of CR beginning and then stabilized. Regression of daily home weights provided the most reliable estimate of short-term change in energy stores. In summary, optimal quantification of energy intake and %CR during weight loss necessitates a TEE measurement within the first month of CR to capture the rapid reduction in TEE.

Citing Articles

A 2-year calorie restriction intervention reduces glycomic biological age biomarkers.

Pribic T, Das J, derek L, Belsky D, Orenduff M, Huffman K medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677441 PMC: 11643172. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.04.24318451.


Energy expenditure, metabolic adaptation, physical activity and energy intake following weight loss: comparison between bariatric surgery and low-calorie diet.

Falkenhain K, Martin C, Ravussin E, Redman L Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024; .

PMID: 39478234 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-024-01523-8.


Quantification of the effect of GLP-1R agonists on body weight using in vitro efficacy information: An extension of the Hall body composition model.

Bosch R, Sijbrands E, Snelder N CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(9):1488-1502.

PMID: 38867373 PMC: 11533103. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13183.


Physiology of the weight-loss plateau in response to diet restriction, GLP-1 receptor agonism, and bariatric surgery.

Hall K Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024; 32(6):1163-1168.

PMID: 38644683 PMC: 11132924. DOI: 10.1002/oby.24027.


Effect of long-term caloric restriction on telomere length in healthy adults: CALERIE™ 2 trial analysis.

Hastings W, Ye Q, Wolf S, Ryan C, Das S, Huffman K Aging Cell. 2024; 23(6):e14149.

PMID: 38504468 PMC: 11296136. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14149.


References
1.
Das S, Gilhooly C, Golden J, Pittas A, Fuss P, Cheatham R . Long-term effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in glycemic load on dietary adherence, body composition, and metabolism in CALERIE: a 1-y randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85(4):1023-30. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/85.4.1023. View

2.
Racette S, Weiss E, Villareal D, Arif H, Steger-May K, Schechtman K . One year of caloric restriction in humans: feasibility and effects on body composition and abdominal adipose tissue. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006; 61(9):943-50. PMC: 4376245. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.9.943. View

3.
Redman L, Ravussin E . Caloric restriction in humans: impact on physiological, psychological, and behavioral outcomes. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010; 14(2):275-87. PMC: 3014770. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3253. View

4.
Westerterp K, van den Berg H . Impact of a moderately energy-restricted diet on energy metabolism and body composition in non-obese men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995; 19(5):318-24. View

5.
Trabulsi J, Troiano R, Subar A, Sharbaugh C, Kipnis V, Schatzkin A . Precision of the doubly labeled water method in a large-scale application: evaluation of a streamlined-dosing protocol in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57(11):1370-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601698. View