» Articles » PMID: 22112655

Influence of Network Dynamics on the Spread of Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Overview
Date 2011 Nov 25
PMID 22112655
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Network epidemiology often assumes that the relationships defining the social network of a population are static. The dynamics of relationships is only taken indirectly into account by assuming that the relevant information to study epidemic spread is encoded in the network obtained, by considering numbers of partners accumulated over periods of time roughly proportional to the infectious period of the disease. On the other hand, models explicitly including social dynamics are often too schematic to provide a reasonable representation of a real population, or so detailed that no general conclusions can be drawn from them. Here, we present a model of social dynamics that is general enough so its parameters can be obtained by fitting data from surveys about sexual behaviour, but that can still be studied analytically, using mean-field techniques. This allows us to obtain some general results about epidemic spreading. We show that using accumulated network data to estimate the static epidemic threshold lead to a significant underestimation of that threshold. We also show that, for a dynamic network, the relative epidemic threshold is an increasing function of the infectious period of the disease, implying that the static value is a lower bound to the real threshold. A practical example is given of how to apply the model to the study of a real population.

Citing Articles

Coupling dynamics of epidemic spreading and information diffusion on complex networks.

Zhan X, Liu C, Zhou G, Zhang Z, Sun G, Zhu J Appl Math Comput. 2020; 332:437-448.

PMID: 32287501 PMC: 7112333. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.050.


Molecular epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains circulating in Indonesia using multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) techniques.

Hananta I, van Dam A, van der Loeff M, Dierdorp M, Wind C, Soebono H BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1):7.

PMID: 29304758 PMC: 5755298. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2940-5.


Predicting and controlling infectious disease epidemics using temporal networks.

Masuda N, Holme P F1000Prime Rep. 2013; 5:6.

PMID: 23513178 PMC: 3590785. DOI: 10.12703/P5-6.


Epidemics scenarios in the "Romantic network".

Carvalho A, Goncalves S PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49009.

PMID: 23209561 PMC: 3507840. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049009.

References
1.
Newman M . Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002; 66(1 Pt 2):016128. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016128. View

2.
Hamilton D, Handcock M, Morris M . Degree distributions in sexual networks: a framework for evaluating evidence. Sex Transm Dis. 2008; 35(1):30-40. PMC: 4370286. DOI: 10.1097/olq.0b013e3181453a84. View

3.
Thomas J, Tucker M . The development and use of the concept of a sexually transmitted disease core. J Infect Dis. 1996; 174 Suppl 2:S134-43. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/174.supplement_2.s134. View

4.
Liljeros F, Edling C, Amaral L, Stanley H, Aberg Y . The web of human sexual contacts. Nature. 2001; 411(6840):907-8. DOI: 10.1038/35082140. View

5.
Bauch C . A versatile ODE approximation to a network model for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. J Math Biol. 2002; 45(5):375-95. DOI: 10.1007/s002850200153. View