» Articles » PMID: 20071193

Age- and Gender-specific Estimates of Partnership Formation and Dissolution Rates in the Seattle Sex Survey

Overview
Journal Ann Epidemiol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2010 Jan 15
PMID 20071193
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Partnership formation and dissolution rates are primary determinants of sexually transmitted infection (STI) transmission dynamics.

Methods: The authors used data on persons' lifetime sexual experiences from a 2003-2004 random digit dialing survey of Seattle residents aged 18-39 years (N=1,194) to estimate age- and gender-specific partnership formation and dissolution rates. Partnership start and end dates were used to estimate participants' ages at the start of each partnership and partnership durations, and partnerships not enumerated in the survey were imputed.

Results: Partnership formation peaked at age 19 at 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.04) partnerships per year and decreased to 0.1 to 0.2 after age 30 for women and peaked at age 20 at 1.4 (95% CI: 1.08-1.64) and declined to 0.5 after age 30 for men. Nearly one fourth (23.7%) of partnerships ended within 1 week and more than one half (51.2%) ended within 12 weeks. Most (63.5%) individuals 30 to 39 years of age had not formed a new sexual partnership in the past 3 years.

Conclusion: A large proportion of the heterosexual population is no longer at substantial STI risk by their early 30s, but similar analyses among high-risk populations may give insight into reasons for the profound disparities in STI rates across populations.

Citing Articles

Pair formation models for sexually transmitted infections: A primer.

Kretzschmar M, Heijne J Infect Dis Model. 2018; 2(3):368-378.

PMID: 29928748 PMC: 6002071. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2017.07.002.


Could the human papillomavirus vaccines drive virulence evolution?.

Murall C, Bauch C, Day T Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 282(1798):20141069.

PMID: 25429011 PMC: 4262157. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1069.


A comparison of sexual behavior patterns among men who have sex with men and heterosexual men and women.

Glick S, Morris M, Foxman B, Aral S, Manhart L, Holmes K J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012; 60(1):83-90.

PMID: 22522237 PMC: 3334840. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318247925e.


When they break up and get back together: length of adolescent romantic relationships and partner concurrency.

Matson P, Chung S, Ellen J Sex Transm Dis. 2012; 39(4):281-5.

PMID: 22421694 PMC: 3306595. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318244ac31.


Influence of network dynamics on the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Risau-Gusman S J R Soc Interface. 2011; 9(71):1363-72.

PMID: 22112655 PMC: 3350717. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0445.


References
1.
Stigum H, Magnus P, Harris J, Samuelsen S, Bakketeig L . Frequency of sexual partner change in a Norwegian population. Data distribution and covariates. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 145(7):636-43. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009161. View

2.
Morris M, Podhisita C, Wawer M, Handcock M . Bridge populations in the spread of HIV/AIDS in Thailand. AIDS. 1996; 10(11):1265-71. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199609000-00013. View

3.
Anderson R, May R . Epidemiological parameters of HIV transmission. Nature. 1988; 333(6173):514-9. DOI: 10.1038/333514a0. View

4.
Scherer A, McLean A . Mathematical models of vaccination. Br Med Bull. 2002; 62:187-99. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/62.1.187. View

5.
Anderson R, Garnett G . Mathematical models of the transmission and control of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2000; 27(10):636-43. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-200011000-00012. View