» Articles » PMID: 22075772

Using Ecological Frameworks to Advance a Field of Research, Practice, and Policy on Aging-in-place Initiatives

Overview
Journal Gerontologist
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2011 Nov 15
PMID 22075772
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Initiatives to promote aging in place have emerged rapidly in the United States across various health care settings (e.g., acute care hospitals, skilled nursing facilities) and broader community settings (e.g., public social service agencies). Moreover, recent federal policies include a growing number of provisions for local efforts to promote aging in place. Despite emerging bodies of research that have described singular initiatives in their own right, there has been very little scholarship that forges conceptual linkages across this increasingly vast domain of research, practice, and policy. Integrative theory development is critical to ensure that aging-in-place initiatives do not become fragmented from each other. This article uses insights from ecological frameworks-specifically Urie Bronfenbrenner's bioecological systems theory and M. Powell Lawton's general ecological model of aging-to conceptualize a range of programs as aging-in-place initiatives and for describing their similarities and differences, particularly in terms of the features through which they intend to promote aging in place. Theoretically derived dimensions along which to characterize aging-in-place initiatives include environment-focused aspects (e.g., the types of social systems and structures that the initiatives target for change) and person-focused aspects (e.g., the extent to which the initiatives target particular subgroups of older adults). The article concludes with a discussion on how these theoretically derived dimensions can be used to advance and integrate research, practice, and policy to systematically develop and expand aging-in-place initiatives.

Citing Articles

Neighborhood environment and quality of life of older adults in eastern Nepal: findings from a cross-sectional study.

Sapkota K, Shrestha A, Ghimire S, Mistry S, Yadav K, Yadav S BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):679.

PMID: 39138405 PMC: 11323633. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05278-6.


Aging in Place for Community-Dwelling Older Adults in India: A Qualitative Exploration of Prospects and Challenges.

Thampi K, Mathew L Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2024; 10:23337214231223636.

PMID: 38187403 PMC: 10771738. DOI: 10.1177/23337214231223636.


Care Partner Confidence and Experiences in Legal Planning for People Living With Dementia: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Jolliff A, Fields B, Boutilier J, Dudek A, Elliott C, Zuraw M Gerontologist. 2023; 64(7).

PMID: 37941389 PMC: 11190962. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad153.


Implications of Aging in Place in the Context of the Residential Environment: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review.

Seo E, Lee S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(20).

PMID: 37887643 PMC: 10606307. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20206905.


Association of neighborhood recreational facilities and depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults.

Mu Y, Yi M, Liu Q BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):667.

PMID: 37848820 PMC: 10583466. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04369-0.