Modelling Age-friendly Environment for Social Connectedness: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal F1000Res

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Science

Date 2022 Jan 17

PMID 35035892

Authors

Lein Shi Ying

Lai Ming Ming

Lau Siok Hwa

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The increase in aged populations in Malaysia has brought unprecedented challenges to families, policy makers, scholars, and business organisations. This paper adapted the WHO 2007 framework of features of age-friendly cities to examine age-friendly environment constructs and their linkages with social connectedness from the perspective of Malaysian middle-aged and older adults caring for themselves. A face-to-face cross-sectional survey was conducted on 402 middle-aged and older adults caring for themselves across selected states in west Malaysia, selected via purposive sampling. Firstly, features of age-friendly cities were explored through exploratory factor analysis involving 82 respondents. Subsequently, structural equation modelling was performed, involving 320 respondents. The results indicated that the constructs of an age-friendly environment were built environment, community support and health services, civic participation, and employment as well as communication and information. The structural model provided evidence that implementing age-friendly initiatives relating to built environment, community support and health services, civic participation and employment as well as communication and information enables the ageing population to improve their connectedness with society. These findings supported the ecological theories, agreeing that age-friendly environments help middle-aged and older adults caring for themselves to increase their adaptability and reduce perceived pressure from the environment. This result was in line with the current literature in which an age-friendly environment is a form of support and an enabling environment to cultivate positive social relationships and connectivity. Creating an age-friendly environment that supports active and healthy living for middle-aged and older adults caring for themselves allows them to continue to share their experiences, knowledge, and wisdom. This is helpful and beneficial for societal well-being and economic development as well as for the future generations.

References

JAQUES E . Death and the mid-life crisis. Int J Psychoanal. 1965; 46(4):502-14. View

Paul C, Ribeiro O, Teixeira L . Active Ageing: An Empirical Approach to the WHO Model. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2012; 2012:382972. PMC: 3501803. DOI: 10.1155/2012/382972. View

Quinn A . Healthy aging in cities. J Urban Health. 2008; 85(2):151-3. PMC: 2430120. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-008-9268-9. View

Hayduk L, Littvay L . Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:159. PMC: 3506474. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-159. View

Lai M, Lein S, Lau S, Lai M . Modeling Age-Friendly Environment, Active Aging, and Social Connectedness in an Emerging Asian Economy. J Aging Res. 2016; 2016:2052380. PMC: 4887625. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2052380. View

Maneesriwongul W, Dixon J . Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48(2):175-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x. View

Alley D, Liebig P, Pynoos J, Banerjee T, Choi I . Creating elder-friendly communities: preparations for an aging society. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2007; 49(1-2):1-18. DOI: 10.1300/j083v49n01_01. View

Lawton M . Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist. 1983; 23(4):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/geront/23.4.349. View

Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N . Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health. 2008; 11(3):509-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00292.x. View

10.

Emlet C, Moceri J . The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities. J Aging Res. 2011; 2012:173247. PMC: 3227400. DOI: 10.1155/2012/173247. View

11.

Lui C, Everingham J, Warburton J, Cuthill M, Bartlett H . What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australas J Ageing. 2009; 28(3):116-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x. View

12.

Lawton M . Social ecology and the health of older people. Am J Public Health. 1974; 64(3):257-60. PMC: 1775433. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.64.3.257. View

13.

Gibney S, Zhang M, Brennan C . Age-friendly environments and psychosocial wellbeing: a study of older urban residents in Ireland. Aging Ment Health. 2019; 24(12):2022-2033. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1652246. View

14.

Franke T, Tong C, Ashe M, McKay H, Sims-Gould J . The secrets of highly active older adults. J Aging Stud. 2013; 27(4):398-409. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.09.003. View

15.

Feldman P, Oberlink M . Developing community indicators to promote the health and well-being of older people. Fam Community Health. 2003; 26(4):268-74. DOI: 10.1097/00003727-200310000-00004. View

16.

Brennan Ramirez L, Hoehner C, Brownson R, Cook R, Orleans C, Hollander M . Indicators of activity-friendly communities: an evidence-based consensus process. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31(6):515-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.026. View

17.

Kim H . Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod. 2013; 38(1):52-4. PMC: 3591587. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52. View

18.

Menec V, Means R, Keating N, Parkhurst G, Eales J . Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Can J Aging. 2011; 30(3):479-93. DOI: 10.1017/S0714980811000237. View

19.

Rogers W, Mitzner T . Envisioning the Future for Older Adults: Autonomy, Health, Well-being, and Social Connectedness with Technology Support. Futures. 2017; 87:133-139. PMC: 5407378. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.07.002. View

20.

Cotten S, Anderson W, McCullough B . Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(2):e39. PMC: 3636305. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2306. View