» Articles » PMID: 22001510

Disulfide Bonding Within Components of the Chlamydia Type III Secretion Apparatus Correlates with Development

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2011 Oct 18
PMID 22001510
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chlamydia spp. exhibit a unique biphasic developmental cycle whereby infectious elementary bodies (EBs) invade host epithelial cells and differentiate into noninfectious, metabolically active reticulate bodies (RBs). EBs posses a unique outer envelope where rigidity is achieved by disulfide bonding among cysteine-rich envelope-associated proteins. Conversely, these disulfide bonds become reduced in RBs to accommodate vegetative growth, thereby linking the redox status of cysteine-rich envelope proteins with progression of the developmental cycle. We investigated the potential role of disulfide bonding within the chlamydial type III secretion system (T3SS), since activity of this system is also closely linked to development. We focused on structural components of the T3S apparatus that contain an unusually high number of cysteine residues compared to orthologs in other secretion systems. Nonreducing SDS-PAGE revealed that EB-localized apparatus proteins such as CdsF, CdsD, and CdsC form higher-order complexes mediated by disulfide bonding. The most dramatic alterations were detected for the needle protein CdsF. Significantly, disulfide bonding patterns shifted during differentiation of developmental forms and were completely reduced in RBs. Furthermore, at later time points during infection following RB to EB conversion, we found that CdsF is reoxidized into higher-order complexes. Overall, we conclude that the redox status of specific T3SS apparatus proteins is intimately linked to the developmental cycle and constitutes a newly appreciated aspect of functionally significant alterations within proteins of the chlamydial envelope.

Citing Articles

Altering the redox status of directly impacts its developmental cycle progression.

Singh V, Ouellette S Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39819645 PMC: 11741522. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98409.


Type III Secretion in .

Rucks E Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023; 87(3):e0003423.

PMID: 37358451 PMC: 10521360. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00034-23.


Chronic Inflammatory Diseases at Secondary Sites Ensuing Urogenital or Pulmonary Infections.

Cheok Y, Lee C, Cheong H, Looi C, Wong W Microorganisms. 2020; 8(1).

PMID: 31963395 PMC: 7022716. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8010127.


Comprehensive Flux Modeling of Proteome and qRT-PCR Data Indicate Biphasic Metabolic Differences Between Elementary Bodies and Reticulate Bodies During Infection.

Yang M, Rajeeve K, Rudel T, Dandekar T Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:2350.

PMID: 31681215 PMC: 6803457. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02350.


Oxidoreductase disulfide bond proteins DsbA and DsbB form an active redox pair in Chlamydia trachomatis, a bacterium with disulfide dependent infection and development.

Christensen S, Halili M, Strange N, Petit G, Huston W, Martin J PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0222595.

PMID: 31536549 PMC: 6752827. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222595.


References
1.
Caldwell H, Kromhout J, Schachter J . Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun. 1981; 31(3):1161-76. PMC: 351439. DOI: 10.1128/iai.31.3.1161-1176.1981. View

2.
Turano C, Coppari S, Altieri F, Ferraro A . Proteins of the PDI family: unpredicted non-ER locations and functions. J Cell Physiol. 2002; 193(2):154-63. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10172. View

3.
Fields K, Hackstadt T . Evidence for the secretion of Chlamydia trachomatis CopN by a type III secretion mechanism. Mol Microbiol. 2000; 38(5):1048-60. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02212.x. View

4.
Newhall 5th W . Biosynthesis and disulfide cross-linking of outer membrane components during the growth cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun. 1987; 55(1):162-8. PMC: 260295. DOI: 10.1128/iai.55.1.162-168.1987. View

5.
Peters J, Wilson D, Myers G, Timms P, Bavoil P . Type III secretion à la Chlamydia. Trends Microbiol. 2007; 15(6):241-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.04.005. View