» Articles » PMID: 21998435

Evaluation of the Impact of Direct Plating, Broth Enrichment, and Specimen Source on Recovery and Diversity of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates Among HIV-infected Outpatients

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2011 Oct 15
PMID 21998435
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared recovery of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from nasal and groin swab specimens of 600 HIV-infected outpatients by selective and nonselective direct plating and broth enrichment. Swabs were collected at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month visits and cultured by direct plating to mannitol salt agar (MSA) and CHROMagar MRSA (CM) and overnight broth enrichment with subculture to MSA (broth). MRSA isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, and PCR for the Panton-Valentine leukocidin. At each visit, 13 to 15% of patients were colonized with MRSA and 30 to 33% were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Broth, CM, and MSA detected 95%, 82%, and 76% of MRSA-positive specimens, respectively. MRSA recovery was significantly higher from broth than CM (P ≤ 0.001) or MSA (P ≤ 0.001); there was no significant difference in recovery between MSA and CM. MSSA recovery also increased significantly when using broth than when using MSA (P ≤ 0.001). Among specimens collected from the groin, broth, CM, and MSA detected 88%, 54%, and 49% of the MRSA-positive isolates, respectively. Broth enrichment had a greater impact on recovery of MRSA from the groin than from the nose compared to both CM (P ≤ 0.001) and MSA (P ≤ 0.001). Overall, 19% of MRSA-colonized patients would have been missed with nasal swab specimen culture only. USA500/Iberian and USA300 were the most common MRSA strains recovered, and USA300 was more likely than other strain types to be recovered from the groin than from the nose (P = 0.05).

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Methods for Sampling of Staphylococcus aureus and Other Staphylococcus Species from Indoor Surfaces.

Madsen A, Phan H, Laursen M, White J, Uhrbrand K Ann Work Expo Health. 2020; 64(9):1020-1034.

PMID: 32968799 PMC: 7750978. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa080.


High levels of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA carriage in healthy population of Algiers revealed by additional enrichment and multisite screening.

Antri K, Akkou M, Bouchiat C, Bes M, Martins-Simoes P, Dauwalder O Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 37(8):1521-1529.

PMID: 29948361 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3279-6.


Underestimation of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) carriage associated with standard culturing techniques: One third of carriers missed.

Tsang S, McHugh M, Guerendiain D, Gwynne P, Boyd J, Simpson A Bone Joint Res. 2018; 7(1):79-84.

PMID: 29330346 PMC: 5805824. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0175.R1.


Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at a palliative care unit: A prospective single service analysis.

Heckel M, Geissdorfer W, Herbst F, Stiel S, Ostgathe C, Bogdan C PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0188940.

PMID: 29228010 PMC: 5724845. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188940.


Prevalence of Nasal Carriage in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected and Uninfected Children in Botswana: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Reid M, Fischer R, Mannathoko N, Muthoga C, McHugh E, Essigmann H Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017; 96(4):795-801.

PMID: 28167588 PMC: 5392623. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0650.


References
1.
Creech 2nd C, Kernodle D, Alsentzer A, Wilson C, Edwards K . Increasing rates of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in healthy children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005; 24(7):617-21. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000168746.62226.a4. View

2.
McDougal L, Steward C, Killgore G, Chaitram J, McAllister S, Tenover F . Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(11):5113-20. PMC: 262524. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003. View

3.
Popovich K, Weinstein R, Hota B . Are community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains replacing traditional nosocomial MRSA strains?. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46(6):787-94. DOI: 10.1086/528716. View

4.
Kazakova S, Hageman J, Matava M, Srinivasan A, Phelan L, Garfinkel B . A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional football players. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(5):468-75. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042859. View

5.
Safdar N, Narans L, Gordon B, Maki D . Comparison of culture screening methods for detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing 32 methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(7):3163-6. PMC: 165368. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3163-3166.2003. View