» Articles » PMID: 17317837

Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Recurrent Malignant Glioma

Abstract

Purpose: Recurrent grade III-IV gliomas have a dismal prognosis with minimal improvements in survival seen following currently available salvage therapy. This study was conducted to determine if the combination of a novel antiangiogenic therapy, bevacizumab, and a cytotoxic agent, irinotecan, is safe and effective for patients with recurrent grade III-IV glioma.

Experimental Design: We conducted a phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in adults with recurrent grade III-IV glioma. Patients with evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on initial brain magnetic resonance imaging were excluded. Patients were scheduled to receive bevacizumab and irinotecan i.v. every 2 weeks of a 6-week cycle. Bevacizumab was administered at 10 mg/kg. The dose of irinotecan was determined based on antiepileptic use: patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs received 340 mg/m(2), whereas patients not taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs received 125 mg/m(2). Toxicity and response were assessed.

Results: Thirty-two patients were assessed (23 with grade IV glioma and 9 with grade III glioma). Radiographic responses were noted in 63% (20 of 32) of patients (14 of 23 grade IV patients and 6 of 9 grade III patients). The median progression-free survival was 23 weeks for all patients (95% confidence interval, 15-30 weeks; 20 weeks for grade IV patients and 30 weeks for grade III patients). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 38% and the 6-month overall survival probability was 72%. No central nervous system hemorrhages occurred, but three patients developed deep venous thromboses or pulmonary emboli, and one patient had an arterial ischemic stroke.

Conclusions: The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan is an active regimen for recurrent grade III-IV glioma with acceptable toxicity.

Citing Articles

Regorafenib Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma Beyond Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Large, Multicenter, Real-Life Study.

Tunbekici S, Yuksel H, Acar C, Sahin G, Orman S, Majidova N Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796675 PMC: 11718784. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010046.


From single-cell to spatial transcriptomics: decoding the glioma stem cell niche and its clinical implications.

Cao L, Lu X, Wang X, Wu H, Miao X Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1475235.

PMID: 39355251 PMC: 11443156. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1475235.


Local Delivery of Irinotecan to Recurrent GBM Patients at Reoperation Offers a Safe Route of Administration.

McConville C, Lastakchi S, Al Amri A, Ngoga D, Fayeye O, Cruickshank G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272866 PMC: 11393903. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173008.


Recent Treatment Strategies and Molecular Pathways in Resistance Mechanisms of Antiangiogenic Therapies in Glioblastoma.

Rahman M, Ali M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272834 PMC: 11394361. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172975.


Interference of FZD2 suppresses proliferation, vasculogenic mimicry and stemness in glioma cells via blocking the Notch/NF‑κB signaling pathway.

Ran Y, Han S, Gao D, Chen X, Liu C Exp Ther Med. 2024; 28(4):373.

PMID: 39091630 PMC: 11292164. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12662.