» Articles » PMID: 21986346

The Effect of a Structured Behavioral Intervention on Poorly Controlled Diabetes: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Arch Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Oct 12
PMID 21986346
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although maintaining nearly normal glycemia delays onset and slows progression of diabetes complications, many patients with diabetes and their physicians struggle to achieve glycemic targets. The best methods to support patients as they follow diabetes prescriptions and recommendations are unclear.

Methods: To test the efficacy of a behavioral diabetes intervention in improving glycemia in long-duration, poorly controlled diabetes, we randomized 222 adults with diabetes (49% type 1) (mean [SD] age, 53 [12] years; mean [SD] disease duration 18 [12] years; mean [SD] hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] concentration, 9.0% [1.1%]) to attend (1) a 5-session manual-based, educator-led structured group intervention with cognitive behavioral strategies (structured behavioral arm); (2) an educator-led attention control group education program (group attention control); or (3) unlimited individual nurse and dietitian education sessions for 6 months (individual control). Outcomes were baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month postintervention HbA(1c) levels (primary) and frequency of diabetes self-care, 3-day pedometer readings, 24-hour diet recalls, average number of glucose checks, physical fitness, depression, coping style, self-efficacy, and quality of life (secondary).

Results: Linear mixed modeling found that all groups showed improved HbA(1c) levels (P < .001). However, the structured behavioral arm showed greater improvements than the group and individual control arms (3-month HbA(1c) concentration changes: -0.8% vs -0.4% and -0.4%, respectively (P = .04 for group × time interaction). Furthermore, participants with type 2 disease showed greater improvement than those with type 1 (P = .04 for type of diabetes × time interaction). Quality of life, glucose monitoring, and frequency of diabetes self-care did not differ by intervention over time.

Conclusions: A structured, cognitive behavioral program is more effective than 2 control interventions in improving glycemia in adults with long-duration diabetes. Educators can successfully use modified psychological and behavioral strategies.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT000142922.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Nurse-Led Interventions on Diseases Management in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.

Dailah H Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38338237 PMC: 10855413. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030352.


Evaluation of Author Instructions for Inclusive Language Guidance in Highly Cited English Language Medical Journals.

Stark J, Cole J J Gen Intern Med. 2023; 39(2):272-276.

PMID: 37670067 PMC: 10853092. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08390-2.


Improving quality of life and self-care for patients on hemodialysis using cognitive behavioral strategies: A randomized controlled pilot trial.

Shirazian S, Smaldone A, Jacobson A, Fazzari M, Weinger K PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285156.

PMID: 37141225 PMC: 10159130. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285156.


Effect of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) on lowering of blood glucose levels in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients: study protocol for a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Pan Y, Liu H, Zhong S Trials. 2023; 24(1):26.

PMID: 36639702 PMC: 9840313. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-07060-8.


National Estimates of Mental Health Needs Among Adults With Self-Reported CKD in the United States.

Wilk A, Hu J, Chehal P, Yarbrough C, Ji X, Cummings J Kidney Int Rep. 2022; 7(7):1630-1642.

PMID: 35812303 PMC: 9263246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.088.


References
1.
Roter D, Hall J, Merisca R, Nordstrom B, Cretin D, Svarstad B . Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 1998; 36(8):1138-61. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199808000-00004. View

2.
Vinik A, Park T, Stansberry K, Pittenger G . Diabetic neuropathies. Diabetologia. 2000; 43(8):957-73. DOI: 10.1007/s001250051477. View

3.
Peyrot M, McMurry Jr J, Kruger D . A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: stress, coping and regimen adherence. J Health Soc Behav. 1999; 40(2):141-58. View

4.
. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998; 352(9131):837-53. View

5.
van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Nuyen J, Stoop C, Chan J, Jacobson A, Katon W . Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010; 32(4):380-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.011. View