» Articles » PMID: 31603900

Does Task Delegation to Non-physician Health Professionals Improve Quality of Diabetes Care? Results of a Scoping Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Oct 12
PMID 31603900
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: As a result of unhealthy lifestyles, reduced numbers of healthcare providers are having to deal with an increasing number of diabetes patients. In light of this shortage of physicians and nursing staff, new concepts of care are needed. The aim of this scoping review is to review the literature and examine the effects of task delegation to non-physician health professionals, with a further emphasis on inter-professional care.

Research Design And Methods: Systematic searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases to retrieve papers published between January 1994 and December 2017. Randomised/non-randomised controlled trials and studies with a before/after design that described the delegation of tasks from physicians to non-physicians in diabetes care were included in the search. This review is a subgroup analysis that further assesses all the studies conducted using a team-based approach.

Results: A total of 45 studies with 12,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most of the interventions were performed in an outpatient setting with type-2 diabetes mellitus patients. The non-physician healthcare professionals involved in the team were nurses, pharmacists, community health workers and dietitians. Most studies showed significant improvements in glycaemic control and high patient satisfaction, while there were no indications that the task delegation affected quality of life scores.

Conclusions: The findings of the review suggest that task delegation can provide equivalent glycaemic control and potentially lead to an improvement in the quality of care. However, this review revealed a lack of clinical endpoints, as well as an inconsistency between the biochemical outcome parameters and the patient-centred outcome parameters. Given the vast differences between the individual healthcare systems used around the world, further high-quality research with an emphasis on long-term outcome effects and the expertise of non-physicians is needed.

Citing Articles

Impact of community health workers on diabetes management in an urban United States Community with high diabetes burden through the COVID pandemic.

Hansotte E, Andrea S, Weathers T, Stone C, Jessup A, Staten L Prev Med Rep. 2024; 39:102645.

PMID: 38370984 PMC: 10869924. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102645.


Optimizing the frequency of physician encounters in follow - up care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

Xu W, Mak I, Zhang R, Yu E, Ng A, Lui D BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):41.

PMID: 38279105 PMC: 10811944. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02277-9.


[Attitudes of general practitioners and medical practice assistants towards the delegation of medical services: Results of a survey in Berlin, Brandenburg and Thuringia].

Wolf F, Krause M, Meissner F, Rost L, Bleidorn J, Dierks M Gesundheitswesen. 2023; 85(12):1115-1123.

PMID: 38081173 PMC: 10713333. DOI: 10.1055/a-2158-8982.


Pathway From Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis to Action: How to Move People Forward.

Boakye M, Miyamoto S, Greenwood D, Kraschnewski J, Van Haitsma K, Boltz M Diabetes Spectr. 2023; 36(3):264-274.

PMID: 37583554 PMC: 10425228. DOI: 10.2337/ds22-0058.


Are Nurse-Led Patient Consultations and Nurse-Led Dose Adjustments of Permanent Medication Acceptable for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension in General Practice? - Results of a Focus Group Study.

Weise S, Steybe T, Thiel C, Frese T Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17:1501-1512.

PMID: 37383032 PMC: 10296604. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S411902.


References
1.
Yarnall K, Ostbye T, Krause K, Pollak K, Gradison M, Michener J . Family physicians as team leaders: "time" to share the care. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6(2):A59. PMC: 2687865. View

2.
Chen J, Ou H, Lin T, Lai E, Kao Y . Pharmaceutical care of elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015; 38(1):88-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0210-4. View

3.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View

4.
Wagner E . The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ. 2000; 320(7234):569-72. PMC: 1117605. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.569. View

5.
Wagner E, Grothaus L, Sandhu N, Galvin M, McGregor M, Artz K . Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(4):695-700. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.695. View