Designing Attractive Models Via Automated Identification of Chaotic and Oscillatory Dynamical Regimes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Chaos and oscillations continue to capture the interest of both the scientific and public domains. Yet despite the importance of these qualitative features, most attempts at constructing mathematical models of such phenomena have taken an indirect, quantitative approach, for example, by fitting models to a finite number of data points. Here we develop a qualitative inference framework that allows us to both reverse-engineer and design systems exhibiting these and other dynamical behaviours by directly specifying the desired characteristics of the underlying dynamical attractor. This change in perspective from quantitative to qualitative dynamics, provides fundamental and new insights into the properties of dynamical systems.
Chaos in synthetic microbial communities.
Karkaria B, Manhart A, Fedorec A, Barnes C PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(10):e1010548.
PMID: 36215322 PMC: 9584520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010548.
Pitt J, Banga J BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(1):82.
PMID: 30770736 PMC: 6377730. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2630-y.
Predicting the bounds of large chaotic systems using low-dimensional manifolds.
Haugaard A PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179507.
PMID: 28644871 PMC: 5482462. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179507.
Yang S, Deng B, Wang J, Li H, Liu C, Fietkiewicz C Sci Rep. 2017; 7:40152.
PMID: 28065938 PMC: 5220381. DOI: 10.1038/srep40152.
Robustness of MEK-ERK Dynamics and Origins of Cell-to-Cell Variability in MAPK Signaling.
Filippi S, Barnes C, Kirk P, Kudo T, Kunida K, McMahon S Cell Rep. 2016; 15(11):2524-35.
PMID: 27264188 PMC: 4914773. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.024.