Power Calculations for Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease
Overview
Neurology
Authors
Affiliations
The Alzheimer research community is actively pursuing novel biomarker and other biologic measures to characterize disease progression or to use as outcome measures in clinical trials. One product of these efforts has been a large literature reporting power calculations and estimates of sample size for planning future clinical trials and cohort studies with longitudinal rate of change outcome measures. Sample size estimates reported in this literature vary greatly depending on a variety of factors, including the statistical methods and model assumptions used in their calculation. We review this literature and suggest standards for reporting power calculation results. Regardless of the statistical methods used, studies consistently find that volumetric neuroimaging measures of regions of interest, such as hippocampal volume, outperform global cognitive scales traditionally used in clinical treatment trials in terms of the number of subjects required to detect a fixed percentage slowing of the rate of change observed in demented and cognitively impaired populations. However, statistical methods, model assumptions, and parameter estimates used in power calculations are often not reported in sufficient detail to be of maximum utility. We review the factors that influence sample size estimates, and discuss outstanding issues relevant to planning longitudinal studies of Alzheimer's disease.
Reliability of structural brain change in cognitively healthy adult samples.
Vidal-Pineiro D, Sorensen O, Stromstad M, Amlien I, Anderson M, Baare W bioRxiv. 2025; .
PMID: 40027710 PMC: 11870432. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.03.592804.
Claes A, De Mesel A, Struyf T, Verborgt O, Struyf F JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e56522.
PMID: 39556824 PMC: 11612598. DOI: 10.2196/56522.
Assessing Alzheimer's disease via plasma extracellular vesicle-derived mRNA.
Pham L, Chang C, Tuchez K, Liu F, Chen Y Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024; 16(3):e70006.
PMID: 39279994 PMC: 11399882. DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70006.
Prevalence and Impact of Bypassing or Overriding Phase 2 Trials in Neurologic Drug Development.
Moyer H, Mellett R, Vigneault K, McKeown M, Karlawish J, Augustine E Neurology. 2024; 103(1):e209533.
PMID: 38833654 PMC: 11226307. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209533.
Mendes A, Ribaldi F, Lathuiliere A, Ashton N, Zetterberg H, Abramowicz M Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1):110.
PMID: 38755703 PMC: 11097559. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01478-9.