» Articles » PMID: 21965097

Predictors of Successful Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Weaning After Assistance for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2011 Oct 4
PMID 21965097
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Detailed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning strategies and specific predictors of ECMO weaning success are lacking. This study evaluated a weaning strategy following support for refractory cardiogenic shock to identify clinical, hemodynamic, and Doppler echocardiography parameters associated with successful ECMO removal.

Methods: Hemodynamically stable patients underwent ECMO flow reduction trials to <1.5 L/min under clinical and Doppler echocardiography monitoring. When a patient had partially or fully recovered from severe cardiac dysfunction, tolerated the weaning trial, and had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >20-25% and aortic time-velocity integral (VTI) >10 cm under minimal ECMO support, device removal was considered.

Results: Among the 51 patients (34 males, aged 54 ± 14 years) who received ECMO for medical (n = 27), postcardiotomy (n = 11), or posttransplantation (n = 5) cardiogenic shock, 38 tolerated at least one ECMO flow reduction trial and 20 were ultimately weaned. Compared with the 13 patients who tolerated the trial but were not deemed weanable, those successfully weaned had, at each ECMO flow level, higher arterial systolic and pulse pressures, VTI, LVEF, and lateral mitral annulus peak systolic velocity (TDSa). All weaned patients had aortic VTI ≥10 cm, LVEF >20-25%, and TDSa ≥6 cm/s at minimal ECMO flow support. These Doppler echocardiography parameters better separated weaned and nonweaned patients than any other parameters tested.

Conclusions: Patients who tolerated a full ECMO weaning trial and had aortic VTI ≥10 cm, LVEF >20-25%, and TDSa ≥6 cm/s at minimal ECMO flow were all successfully weaned. However, further studies are needed to validate these simple and easy-to-acquire Doppler echocardiography parameters as predictors of subsequent ECMO weaning success in patients recovering from severe cardiogenic shock.

Citing Articles

Perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates with transposition of the great arteries: 15 years of experience.

Weeda J, Van Der Palen R, Bunker-Wiersma H, Koers L, Van Es E, Hazekamp M Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 67(2).

PMID: 39842855 PMC: 11814491. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae442.


Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support in New Era of Heart Transplant.

Giovannico L, Fischetti G, Parigino D, Savino L, Bari N, Milano A Transpl Int. 2025; 37:12981.

PMID: 39741494 PMC: 11688170. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12981.


Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock.

Elliott A, Dahyia G, Kalra R, Alexy T, Bartos J, Kosmopoulos M US Cardiol. 2024; 15:e23.

PMID: 39720488 PMC: 11664775. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.13.


Hemodynamic-based Assessment and Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Hernandez-Montfort J, Miranda D, Randhawa V, Sleiman J, Seijo de Armas Y, Lewis A US Cardiol. 2024; 16:e05.

PMID: 39600847 PMC: 11588170. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.12.


My echo checklist in venoarterial ECMO patients.

Saura O, Combes A, Hekimian G Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(12):2158-2161.

PMID: 39453492 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07659-2.


References
1.
Pages O, Aubert S, Combes A, Luyt C, Pavie A, Leger P . Paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist device versus extracorporal membrane oxygenation-extracorporal life support in adult fulminant myocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137(1):194-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.051. View

2.
Magovern Jr G, Simpson K . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult cardiac support: the Allegheny experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68(2):655-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00581-0. View

3.
Megarbane B, Leprince P, Deye N, Resiere D, Guerrier G, Rettab S . Emergency feasibility in medical intensive care unit of extracorporeal life support for refractory cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33(5):758-764. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0568-4. View

4.
Combes A, Leprince P, Luyt C, Bonnet N, Trouillet J, Leger P . Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36(5):1404-11. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816f7cf7. View

5.
Muehrcke D, McCarthy P, Stewart R, Foster R, Ogella D, Borsh J . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 61(2):684-91. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01042-4. View