Hemodynamic-based Assessment and Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Overview

Journal US Cardiol

Date 2024 Nov 27

PMID 39600847

Authors

Jaime Hernandez-Montfort

Diana Miranda

Varinder Kaur Randhawa

Jose Sleiman

Yelenis Seijo de Armas

Antonio Lewis

Ziad Taimeh

Paulino Alvarez

Paul Cremer

Bernardo Perez-Villa

Viviana Navas

Emad Hakemi

Mauricio Velez

Luis Hernandez-Mejia

Cedric Sheffield

Nicolas Brozzi

Robert Cubeddu

Jose Navia

Jerry D Estep

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a deadly disease entity challenging patients, caregivers, and communities across the globe. CS can rapidly lead to the development of hypoperfusion and end-organ dysfunction, transforming a predictable hemodynamic event into a potential high-resource, intense, hemometabolic clinical catastrophe. Based on the scalable heterogeneity from a cellular level to healthcare systems in the hemodynamic-based management of patients experiencing CS, the authors present considerations towards systematic hemodynamic-based transitions in which distinct clinical entities share the common path of early identification and rapid transitions through an adaptive longitudinal situational awareness model of care that influences specific management considerations. Future studies are needed to best understand optimal management of drugs and devices along with engagement of health systems of care for patients with CS.

References

Alviar C, Miller P, McAreavey D, Katz J, Lee B, Moriyama B . Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(13):1532-1553. PMC: 11032173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.074. View

Vallabhajosyula S, Shankar A, Patlolla S, Prasad A, Bell M, Jentzer J . Pulmonary artery catheter use in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail. 2020; 7(3):1234-1245. PMC: 7261549. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12652. View

Konstam M, Kiernan M, Bernstein D, Bozkurt B, Jacob M, Kapur N . Evaluation and Management of Right-Sided Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 137(20):e578-e622. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000560. View

Kapur N, Whitehead E, Thayer K, Pahuja M . The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety. F1000Res. 2020; 9. PMC: 7391013. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.25518.1. View

Tschope C, Spillmann F, Potapov E, Faragli A, Rapis K, Nelki V . The "TIDE"-Algorithm for the Weaning of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Temporarily Mechanical Left Ventricular Support With Impella Devices. A Cardiovascular Physiology-Based Approach. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:563484. PMC: 7933542. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.563484. View

Hernandez-Montfort J, Xie R, Ton V, Meyns B, Nakatani T, Yanase M . Longitudinal impact of temporary mechanical circulatory support on durable ventricular assist device outcomes: An IMACS registry propensity matched analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019; 39(2):145-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.009. View

Kapur N, Hirst C . Counterpulsation requires pulsation: IABP use in patients with heart failure without acute MI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 92(4):711-712. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27878. View

Fried J, Nair A, Takeda K, Clerkin K, Topkara V, Masoumi A . Clinical and hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in chronic heart failure patients with cardiogenic shock. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018; 37(11):1313-1321. PMC: 6148415. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.011. View

Mattox E . Complications of Peripheral Venous Access Devices: Prevention, Detection, and Recovery Strategies. Crit Care Nurse. 2017; 37(2):e1-e14. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2017657. View

10.

Daly M, Long B, Koyfman A, Lentz S . Identifying cardiogenic shock in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(11):2425-2433. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.045. View

11.

Yadav K, Lewis R . Immortal Time Bias in Observational Studies. JAMA. 2021; 325(7):686-687. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.9151. View

12.

Hernandez G, Lemor A, Blumer V, Rueda C, Zalawadiya S, Stevenson L . Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Heart Failure With and Without Cardiogenic Shock. J Card Fail. 2019; 25(5):364-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.03.004. View

13.

Kaki A, Alraies M, Kajy M, Blank N, Glazier J, Mohamad T . Large bore occlusive sheath management. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93(4):678-684. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28101. View

14.

Samsky M, Krucoff M, Morrow D, Abraham W, Aguel F, Althouse A . Cardiac safety research consortium "shock II" think tank report: Advancing practical approaches to generating evidence for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2020; 230:93-97. PMC: 7704747. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.09.015. View

15.

Brener M, Rosenblum H, Burkhoff D . Pathophysiology and Advanced Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020; 16(1):7-15. PMC: 7137617. DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-7. View

16.

Bertoldi L, Pappalardo F, Lubos E, Grahn H, Rybczinski M, Barten M . Bridging INTERMACS 1 patients from VA-ECMO to LVAD via Impella 5.0: De-escalate and ambulate. J Crit Care. 2020; 57:259-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.028. View

17.

Krishnan S, Schmidt G . Hemodynamic monitoring in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patient. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019; 25(3):285-291. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000602. View

18.

Ammirati E, Veronese G, Brambatti M, Merlo M, Cipriani M, Potena L . Fulminant Versus Acute Nonfulminant Myocarditis in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(3):299-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.063. View

19.

Bootsma I, Boerma E, Scheeren T, de Lange F . The contemporary pulmonary artery catheter. Part 2: measurements, limitations, and clinical applications. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021; 36(1):17-31. PMC: 7917533. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00673-5. View

20.

Garcia-Cruz E, Manzur-Sandoval D, Rascon-Sabido R, Gopar-Nieto R, Barajas-Campos R, Jordan-Rios A . Critical care ultrasonography during COVID-19 pandemic: The ORACLE protocol. Echocardiography. 2020; 37(9):1353-1361. DOI: 10.1111/echo.14837. View